User talk:Morekar: Difference between revisions

 

Line 114: Line 114:

Hi Morekar. Can I ask whether you are using an LLM or other AI tools to edit Wikipedia, and if so whether you could describe how you are using it and the process that you are using to review its outputs? The reason for my query is that your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyBudget]] seemed to be quite clearly AI-generated, and you ended up giving somewhat contradictory responses at that AfD as to whether you had actually read the sources involved. I can see that you have also made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Morekar/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1315208127 sandbox edits] that were evidently generated by [[Grok (chatbot)|Grok]], and you seem to be using very different writing styles across your different edits. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1319898201 This post] at [[WP:RSN]] also seems to have been AI-generated. If you are using AI, I’d suggest being more transparent about how you are using it, and being particularly careful about the usage of LLM output at NPP and AfD. Thanks. [[User:MCE89|MCE89]] ([[User talk:MCE89|talk]]) 06:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Morekar. Can I ask whether you are using an LLM or other AI tools to edit Wikipedia, and if so whether you could describe how you are using it and the process that you are using to review its outputs? The reason for my query is that your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyBudget]] seemed to be quite clearly AI-generated, and you ended up giving somewhat contradictory responses at that AfD as to whether you had actually read the sources involved. I can see that you have also made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Morekar/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1315208127 sandbox edits] that were evidently generated by [[Grok (chatbot)|Grok]], and you seem to be using very different writing styles across your different edits. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1319898201 This post] at [[WP:RSN]] also seems to have been AI-generated. If you are using AI, I’d suggest being more transparent about how you are using it, and being particularly careful about the usage of LLM output at NPP and AfD. Thanks. [[User:MCE89|MCE89]] ([[User talk:MCE89|talk]]) 06:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, thanks for your suggestion. I’ll be more open in the future when using such AI tools. I will make sure that I won’t rely on AI regarding anything that might have an influence on NPP or AfD decisions. I’ll also be more careful going forward. [[User:Morekar|Morekar]] ([[User talk:Morekar#top|talk]]) 06:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 120 Bahadur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of the following discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/120 Bahadur (2nd nomination).
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Goldsztajn (talk) 10:52, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morekar. Thank you for your work on Santosh Deshmukh Case. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 07:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this poster of the film Dashavatar that you uploaded, the mentioned source links to a different image. Please make either one of the two changes:

1. Correct the source

2. Use the image from the linked source

Also take note of the dimensions of the image you upload. Make sure they are under limit. Kingsacrificer (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reminding me, I forgot to change the link. Morekar (talk) 13:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morekar. Thank you for your work on Atharva Sudame. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article! Since it falls under WP:BLP, please make sure that every sentence is properly footnoted. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Krida Prabodhini when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m creating Page For Vaibhav Santosh Naik The DRAFT page is awailable for this Draft:Vaibhav Santosh Naik can you help to improve this article.It helps to move it main space YAKSH75 (talk) 06:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morekar, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you’re not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dayangaram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Happy Editing — IAmChaos 18:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I created this draft article about two and a half months ago and it still hasn’t been reviewed. Could you please take a look when you have time? Flashthomsom (talk) 06:09, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sharing your draft. I had a look — it’s written well and the sources also look good. Just to let you know, I’m an NPP, so I can’t review AfC submissions. AfC reviews take time because only AfC reviewers can accept or decline drafts.

But don’t worry — your draft looks solid, so it should get reviewed soon. Morekar (talk) 05:31, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morekar. Can I ask whether you are using an LLM or other AI tools to edit Wikipedia, and if so whether you could describe how you are using it and the process that you are using to review its outputs? The reason for my query is that your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyBudget seemed to be quite clearly AI-generated, and you ended up giving somewhat contradictory responses at that AfD as to whether you had actually read the sources involved. I can see that you have also made sandbox edits that were evidently generated by Grok, and you seem to be using very different writing styles across your different edits. This post at WP:RSN also seems to have been AI-generated. If you are using AI, I’d suggest being more transparent about how you are using it, and being particularly careful about the usage of LLM output at NPP and AfD. Thanks. MCE89 (talk) 06:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your suggestion. I’ll be more open in the future when using such AI tools. I will make sure that I won’t rely on AI regarding anything that might have an influence on NPP or AfD decisions. I’ll also be more careful going forward. Morekar (talk) 06:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]