User talk:Moss789: Difference between revisions

 

 

Line 23: Line 23:

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Hamza Ahmed|Hamza Ahmed]] (February 8) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Bonadea was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ”significant” coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ”published”, [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources that are ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=In addition, the information in the sources does not tally with some of the claims in the draft. Insofar as he is known at all, he is not known for “self-improvement content” but for misogyny. But since there’s no sign of actual notability, he doesn’t appear to be “known” for that either.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Hamza Ahmed]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Hamza_Ahmed ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hamza_Ahmed ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

”[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]” <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 11:50, 8 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lynch44 was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs reliable, WP:INDEPENDENT sources. Social blade and the subject’s channel do not count as that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Lynch44 11:19, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moss789!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lynch44 11:19, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition, the information in the sources does not tally with some of the claims in the draft. Insofar as he is known at all, he is not known for “self-improvement content” but for misogyny. But since there’s no sign of actual notability, he doesn’t appear to be “known” for that either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

bonadea contributions talk 11:50, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version