User talk:MozartianMastermindAlternate: Difference between revisions

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks again, and happy editing!

[[User:NeoGaze|NeoGaze]] ([[User talk:NeoGaze|talk]]) 16:17, 29 November 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

[[User:NeoGaze|NeoGaze]] ([[User talk:NeoGaze|talk]]) 16:17, 29 November 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

== World Population Review not reliable ==

World Population Review is [[WP:SPS|self-published]], so it is not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] and should not be cited on Wikipedia. See the [[WP:RSN]] archives for more information. –[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 14:24, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Are you User:MozartianMastermind? I’m assuming so. If so, you’ll need to affirmatively connect the two accounts per WP:SOCKLEGIT. Imzadi 1979 → 01:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you’ve been adding the bulleted-listed style junction lists to some Interstate Highway articles. When a highway has state-detail sub articles, we build out the full exit list tables for each state in those sub articles. We need some sort of summary of that content from those sub articles in the parent article though, which is where there is that very simplified bulleted list-style junction list section. Each article, parent and state sub article, also has a summary of the junctions in

When we don’t have state-detail sub articles, that means we have a single exit list table without the need for a redundant listing like you added to a few articles. Imzadi 1979 → 02:24, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In order for a list to be eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia, there needs to be at least one source that discusses the subject as a group or set. That means you would need a reliable source that discusses the specific category of “largest cities in Asia excluding China, India, and Japan”. I can’t see any such sources in your current references — could you point out any sources that meet this criteria?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

MCE89 (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MozartianMastermindAlternate! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

World Population Review is self-published, so it is not a reliable source and should not be cited on Wikipedia. See the WP:RSN archives for more information. —Worldbruce (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]