From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|
I wanted to tell you that you should check if an article looks complete or has enough relevant information before you go ahead and replace the infobox image with the asteroid shape model. Your edit to the [[269 Justitia]] article has been reverted because you replaced the infobox image with a very outdated shape model of 269 Justitia. The article already has a more accurate and recent shape model below and the occultation diagram in the infoboxx already shows the accurate shape. Lightcurve-derived shape models are not always accurate 100% of the time (as they cannot resolve concave features like craters or bent shapes like that of [[433 Eros]]), so they should be treated with caution if another more recent shape model exists. [[User:Nrco0e|<span style=”font-size:103%; color: #528a2d”>”’Nrco0e”'</span>]] <span style=”font-size:85%”>([[User talk:Nrco0e|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nrco0e|contribs]])</span> 18:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC) |
I wanted to tell you that you should check if an article looks complete or has enough relevant information before you go ahead and replace the infobox image with the asteroid shape model. Your edit to the [[269 Justitia]] article has been reverted because you replaced the infobox image with a very outdated shape model of 269 Justitia. The article already has a more accurate and recent shape model below and the occultation diagram in the infoboxx already shows the accurate shape. Lightcurve-derived shape models are not always accurate 100% of the time (as they cannot resolve concave features like craters or bent shapes like that of [[433 Eros]]), so they should be treated with caution if another more recent shape model exists. [[User:Nrco0e|<span style=”font-size:103%; color: #528a2d”>”’Nrco0e”'</span>]] <span style=”font-size:85%”>([[User talk:Nrco0e|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nrco0e|contribs]])</span> 18:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:my bad ;p [[User:MrAstronomy101|MrAstronomy101]] ([[User talk:MrAstronomy101#top|talk]]) 21:56, 12 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:56, 12 November 2025
Hi MrAstronomy101! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 15:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. MrAstronomy101 (talk) 13:19, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to tell you that you should check if an article looks complete or has enough relevant information before you go ahead and replace the infobox image with the asteroid shape model. Your edit to the 269 Justitia article has been reverted because you replaced the infobox image with a very outdated shape model of 269 Justitia. The article already has a more accurate and recent shape model below and the occultation diagram in the infoboxx already shows the accurate shape. Lightcurve-derived shape models are not always accurate 100% of the time (as they cannot resolve concave features like craters or bent shapes like that of 433 Eros), so they should be treated with caution if another more recent shape model exists. Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 18:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- my bad ;p MrAstronomy101 (talk) 21:56, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
