User talk:NepalFirst: Difference between revisions

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NepalFirst!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

NepalFirst (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can check the reference site why it got rejected

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Hitro talk 13:49, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jlwoodwa were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

jlwoodwa (talk) 04:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JesusisGreat7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 05:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rahmatula786 was: The comment the reviewer left was:

Plz don’t submit again unless you show new independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Suresh Lal Chitrakaar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taffer 😊💬_(she/they) 14:20, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NepalFirst, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Nepali; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Nepali? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. Taffer 😊💬_(she/they) 14:31, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Suresh Lal Chitrakaar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. sk satsuma 16:30, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Khadhya Bank. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and Many sources are 404 links.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

The comment the reviewer left was:

To avoid disappointment, please do not resubmit this article for review until it has been significantly improved– it is nowhere near the minimum standard for drafts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Cabrils (talk) 00:50, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ram Bahadur Khatri.tif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file’s use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia’s image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Marchjuly (talk) 07:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ram Bahadur Khatri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rahmatula786 (talk) 03:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why you delete the articles ill and criminal intenion NepalFirst (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Ram Bahadur Khatri. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 07:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not attacking that duo but he deleted and report articles inill intention that was not advertisement or paid article NepalFirst (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was a valid speedy deletion request (hence, I have executed it). Just because you didn’t agree with it, you must not call other editors “fraud” or “ill and illegal manner” (whatever that means); these are personal attacks and will not be tolerated. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am newly contributer but as per my knowledge and the reliable sources of Media coverage i have publish the articles that editor had deleted in what ground he reported and deleted ? NepalFirst (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That article was promotional with insufficient referencing and no real evidence of notability. Separate to that, it also included a number of copyright images which you have uploaded as your own work, when they clearly aren’t (or if they are, then you have a major conflict of interest in this subject, which you need to disclose).

Precisely for the reason that you are, as you say, a new contributor, I already suggested further down this page that you continue to put your creations through the AfC review system rather than publishing them directly in the main encyclopaedia, until you gain a better understanding of our policies and requirements.

Regardless of all that, the personal attacks must stop, or you will get yourself blocked. Please confirm that you understand. Thank you. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You I got it now i came to know what is next but sure i am not paid writer or advertise anything i just copy the photo which has been available in internet that’s it NepalFirst (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because something is available on the internet does not mean it is free of copyright. In fact, the vast majority of content is covered by copyright, unless it is expressly and clearly indicated otherwise. If you cannot find evidence that something is free of copyright, you must assume it isn’t.

In any case, you must never upload any content as your own work, unless it really is yours (meaning, in most cases, that you have actually created it yourself). When you upload your own work to our servers, you are confirming that it is your property and you are releasing it from copyright and making it available for anyone to do with whatever they please. You obviously cannot release someone else’s property in such a way, that is not only against our policies but is actually against the law. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bunu Uprety requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 07:37, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would suggest that you continue to put your article creations through the AfC review system until such time as you have a better grasp of our policies regarding notability, verifiability, as well as neutral point of view, among others. Thank you, — DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I got your guidance and i will imporve it NepalFirst (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NepalFirst! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 13:09, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why you resubmitted Draft:François I School Complex? You have had no involvement with this draft, that I can see at least, you just went and resubmitted it after it had been restored following a request by another editor. Care to explain? — DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Naren Khadka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rahmatula786 (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Naren Khadka. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Npaisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tracxn.com/d/companies/npaisa/__iIOhcfzZtgfbbVWhMd7KTEvGBfvVUxk5paJM8g_5le8. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia’s copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

A tag has been placed on Sabina Kafle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://influencernepal.com/sabeena-kafle/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John shall you make it move for draft i will change the deto and make the own NepalFirst (talk). 20:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You must know about Balen Shah who is the mayor of Kathmandu her public information is not someone property or copyright effect here because she is public figure and wife of mayor hope you understand NepalFirst (talk). 20:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been previously advised of Wikipedia’s copyright policy. Despite this, you copied verbatim from a copyrighted source to create the Sabina Kafle article. This is not acceptable. You must write articles in your own words. Continued copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Whpq (talk) 21:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i got it NepalFirst (talk). 21:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Kaushalya Abeywickrama when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:38, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kaushalya Abeywickrama. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Its not promotion or interest of conflict never known that persons , In my whole life i don’t have single person from srilanka NepalFirst (talk). 18:00, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The draft is entirely promotional. Dr. Kaushalya Abeywickrama is a multifaceted leader, visionary entrepreneur, and passionate humanist who has seamlessly bridged the worlds of media, academia, healthcare, and social service. See WP: Writing an article. Rewrite the draft and submit it for review. Thanks. Thilsebatti (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i will edit that line NepalFirst (talk). 18:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that line. The whole draft needs to be rewritten. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:32, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok NepalFirst (talk). 03:33, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kaushalya Abeywickrama (journalist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and this article require WP:RS, WP:IS for WP:V.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

@NepalFirst: This article require WP:RS and WP:IS sources for verifiability. Please refer to Wikipedia’s tutorial on creating your first article for guidance on drafting an article and to Referencing for beginners for instructions on formatting references correctly. Kindly note that original research is not permitted. In addition, please refrain from creating duplicate articles regarding the same subject. Regards. QEnigma 论 07:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NepalFirst, I have just deleted a paragraph from this draft, which was copied verbatim from a source clearly claiming copyright. I have warned you about copyright violations before, and I can see that at least one other admin has since done the same. Copyright violations are a serious matter, and persistent violations are also considered a form of vandalism, therefore this must stop now. If you’re unwilling or unable to stay within the rules, I will have no option but to block you from editing.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NepalFirst,

Thank you for creating Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please fix/remove unrelated references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Agent 007 (talk) 17:11, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly help me to make best practices as per standard NepalFirst (talk). 17:17, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You cam check the citation and published article in academic journal etc check in reference libk and kindly make the best update as you can make NepalFirst (talk). 18:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NepalFirst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri for deletion, because the article doesn’t clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. (See notability of politicians)

If you feel that the article shouldn’t be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 18:22, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NepalFirst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Devighat, Nuwakot for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn’t be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 19:54, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Delete it NepalFirst (talk). 20:06, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That incident will not happen again plz unblock me , i am learning but its hard for me to get block ,plz sir consider me last time NepalFirst (talk). 21:42, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were give very explicit warnings about copying text just a few days ago which you acknpowledged, yet you continue to copy text from the web. — Whpq (talk) 21:30, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That incident will not happen again plz unblock me , i am learning but its hard for me to get block ,plz sir consider me last time NepalFirst (talk). 21:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment