User talk:NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM: Difference between revisions

Howdy. If there’s a grudge match between you & @Mandruss:, at Trump’s talkpage? Than so bet it. But, will you please stop repeatly removing the ‘bullet point’ from your posts? Read up on MOS:LISTGAP. — GoodDay (talk) 14:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Hello. This a collaborative editing project, I do not hold grudges. My edits were made with the “reply” tool. They are marked as such in the revision history. None of the indentation is manually added or removed. Please see the MediaWiki DiscussionTools page and bring any concerns you may have about the tool there. NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just don’t delete the bullet pts, again. Please. GoodDay (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: I am not manually adding or removing any of the indentation/ bulletpoints. The tool handles that, as it does when I’m using it to reply to you here. I will continue to use it as it’s more convenient than manually editing talk pages. If you have concerns with the tool, it would be better to discuss them at MediaWiki rather than on my talk page. NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using the tool & post manually. GoodDay (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: I will continue to use the reply tool, as will many other editors. Again, if you have concerns with the tool, it would be more appropriate to discuss them at MediaWiki than on my talk page. Thanks. NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You’re refusing to stop using it? GoodDay (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: I’m using it right now and it seems to be handling the indentation well. It’s also more convenient than manually editing talk pages so I will continue to use it for that reason, yes. NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 15:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tuscarora High School (Virginia), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM. Thank you for your work on Michael Brennan (golfer). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start! Please add footnotes to the few sentences that do not yet have. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:05, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei: Hello. Can you specify which sentences you were referring to? You added a banner tag but no Template:Citation needed tags. The article is sufficiently referenced in my opinion, but I’d be happy to address any specific concerns you have. NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]