User talk:Non-pegasus: Difference between revisions

 

Line 94: Line 94:

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!– Template:Db-draft-deleted –><!– Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom –> <span style=”font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;”>[[User:Liz|””’L””’iz]]</span> <sup style=”font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;”>[[Special:Contributions/Liz|””’Read!””’]] [[User talk:Liz|””’Talk!””’]]</sup> 19:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!– Template:Db-draft-deleted –><!– Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom –> <span style=”font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;”>[[User:Liz|””’L””’iz]]</span> <sup style=”font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;”>[[Special:Contributions/Liz|””’Read!””’]] [[User talk:Liz|””’Talk!””’]]</sup> 19:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

== FA review of [[Rule of inference]] ==

Hello {{u|Non-pegasus}} and thanks for your GA review of the article [[Logical reasoning]] a while back. I was wondering whether you may be interested in reviewing the article [[Rule of inference]] at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rule of inference/archive1]]. I’ve nominated it for FA status, but it hasn’t received enough reviews so far. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. [[User:Phlsph7|Phlsph7]] ([[User talk:Phlsph7|talk]]) 11:19, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

I made a nomination for Logical reasoning to the nominations page but I did a typo; last word in my submission before the question mark should be darkness not light. Is there a proper way to fix this?
Thank you!
Non-pegasus (talk) 02:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the nomination. Please check to see if I did this correctly. PhilKnight (talk) 06:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perfect! Can you help me understand how you did that? When I went to edit the page it only displayed the one-line template instead of the nomination itself. Non-pegasus (talk) 23:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I figured it out. I had to go to the template editting page because the DYK nominations pages would not let me directly reply. Said something about “The “reply” link cannot be used to reply to this comment. To reply, please use the full page editor by clicking “Edit source “.” Is this normal for these kinds of Template talk pages? Non-pegasus (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you figured it out. I honestly don’t know how common this is, but I’ve seen it all kinds of pages, not just Template talk. PhilKnight (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dualism.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Contingency (philosophy) into Draft:Contingency (philosophy). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia’s content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia’s licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you’ve copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice! I had been trying to save myself the time of flipping between two pages and it didn’t even occur to me (for a draft page) that I might need to do something like that. But I will keep that in mind. 🦄 Non-pegasus (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

— RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I’m pleased to inform you that I’ve begun reviewing the article Holism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune — Cessaune (talk) 02:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Holism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Holism and Talk:Holism/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune — Cessaune (talk) 05:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Holism you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Holism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune — Cessaune (talk) 22:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You’re receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Non-pegasus! Your additions to Eros have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NebY (talk) 15:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Non-pegasus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Contingency (philosophy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Non-pegasus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Contingency“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Non-pegasus and thanks for your GA review of the article Logical reasoning a while back. I was wondering whether you may be interested in reviewing the article Rule of inference at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rule of inference/archive1. I’ve nominated it for FA status, but it hasn’t received enough reviews so far. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]