User talk:Number 57: Difference between revisions

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 1.

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 23 § Category:Albert Swifts F.C. players on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you had left, as your edit summary, “I still think this is misleading; the number of MPs is not determined before an election, so I don’t think you can say ‘people were electing X MPs’ when the number they elect might be Y”, which I disagree strongly with

The EBRC proposes a certain map of Singapore and a certain number of MPs to be elected before every general election (not that the gov has to listen, but they listen anyway for ceremonial reasons)

I reverted you as I didn’t see your logic at all; could you explain it? Thanks Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk) 02:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since NCMPs were introduced, the number MPs being elected is not fixed, as Aleain realised here. You edited the 2025 election article to state 97 MPs were elected, but 99 were elected. I’m just going to rollback your edits to avoid making this incorrect statement. Cheers, Number 57 21:23, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NCMPs are appointed

Their “election” is political jargon Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk) 23:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s like saying the top-up MPs in Germany or Bolivia are not elected. While the individuals are appointed, the seats are won by the parties in question based on the election results. Number 57 00:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]