User talk:Nyttend: Difference between revisions

“You have new messages” was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

Hi Nyttend,

You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks.

Nyttend,

All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You’re my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felychko1991 (talk • contribs) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyttend 2803:5B10:22:23C:341F:1D82:B8D7:40F7 (talk) 04:36, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank)

Thank you
BlackAmerican (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Template:NoCommons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11 § Template:NoCommons until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to Currituck County, North Carolina#Communities, but saw you G3’d in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? fiveby(zero) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby’s talk. Nyttend (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, stubbed. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for this guy or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. fiveby(zero) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Dillaby has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16 § Dillaby until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It’s cited in Edward Kesselly, and I’d like to cite it in Quardu Gboni District as well, but I’m having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nyttend,

It seems like years since I’ve run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here’s a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mangoe (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:Draughts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Wikipedia:Draughts until a consensus is reached. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created that article a few years back just like you created Chaseley, North Dakota back in 2008. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you haven’t updated your User:Nyttend/Pennsylvania list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we’re down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —Mr. Matté (^Talk/_Contrib) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The sun1.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} – _talk} 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you’re more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn’t know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? Perodicticus (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. Nyttend (talk) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Marville (comics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Marville (comics until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Kings (game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Kings (game until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of “Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate,” as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn’t enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn’t just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I’m still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.nf utvol (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it’s historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. Kwhopson (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per your question at ANI, I’ll try to answer.

You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it’s less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces.

Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I’ve also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space.

It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock – you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they’ve focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way.

I wasn’t keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it’s a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the ‘pedia from a big range..

See WP:PBLOCK. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? Equine-man (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nyttend,

I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn’t noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They’re quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. Here’s a search result for one of the them AusLondonder (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. Max12Max (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nyttend,

I had requested a deletion of redirect Pain into Power to make way for AFC move of the draft article Draft:Pain into Power. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nyttend, I just made an edit to bring the Neal, Kansas, article in line with MOS:GEOLINK:

N Greenwood County, Kansas, United States ([[Greenwood County, Kansas|Greenwood County]], [[Kansas]], [[United States]])

Y Greenwood County, Kansas, United States ([[Greenwood County, Kansas]], United States)

I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with MOS:GEOLINK. Thanks! —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robinson Township, Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not required due to WP:TWODABS. Articles now appear separately at Robinson, and both link to each other.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Voice of Clam (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cunty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Cunty until a consensus is reached. SmokeSomeDrinkSomePopOne (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site article here . In the description, you have it located ‘off Miller Road’ at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road?
Jacobsatterfield (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your message, no rush, thank you – I’ll try to remember to circle back in a few months.

Jacobsatterfield (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LR.127 (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of Hurricane Kristy (2024) and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? SirMemeGod  17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you mentioned that you weren’t familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious – if enforcing a protection of a page as part of WP:CTOP – there’s a logging procedure outlined at Wikipedia:Contentious_topics#Logging to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as Wikipedia:Arbitration_enforcement_log#American_politics_(CT/AP) for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year.
As I’m editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I’ve encountered my fair share of it, so I’ve become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary 🙂
It’s up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it’s up to you as the admin that imposed it of course 🙂 Raladic (talk) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

The redirect Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15 § Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 05:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mangoe (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect White Home has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16 § White Home until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (u — c) 00:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is that enough? Special:Contributions/Isa123ga Polygnotus (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hm? Polygnotus (talk) 20:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See [1].

I have no opinion one way or the other on the actual edit, but I believe that you are incorrect about the definition of the word “Myth”. You appear to be confusing Myth with Creation myth, as if the concepts National myth, Political myth, Origin myth, and Urban myth did not exist. —Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

٦ 46.161.197.63 (talk) 02:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robley, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This place does not seem to meet WP:NGEO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page’s history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the PROD tag I added to various location pages. I did read the page for notability of geographic places but I mistakenly thought “census tracts” were the same as census-designated districts. I’ve researched within censuses for years and it wired my brain to refer to what WP:NGEO refers to as “census tracts” as “enumeration districts.” I was thinking of census tract as “census-defined tract of land.” I’m really glad you fixed it, and I learned something! Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 03:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, @Nyttend, your reversion of my addition of the PROD tag to Brook does not have obvious justificaiton. If you refer to the page I lined above it SPECIFICALLY says GNIS is not reliable and not considered evidence of notability. I’m going to undo your reversion of my edit on that ground. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 03:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add here, the edit-summary “Obviously it meets WP:NGEO; don’t prod pages out of ignorance” is a personal attack, especially when repeated 40+ times. WP:CIVIL behaviour is important. FOARP (talk) 12:49, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nyttend. I would like to suggest reducing the page protection of Tim Walz from ECP to Semi. This is due to Walz no longer heavily being in the news and therefore probably not a target for vandals, considering that election season, when the initial vandalism occurred, has passed. It also feels extreme to retain the protection level for Walz, since both Harris and Biden, who left office, already have their pages reduced to semi. I hope you will consider this arguement. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 06:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that reasoning is sound, and have reduced to semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Db-redirnonebot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nyttend. This election has already ended and edit wars seem to have stopped, and the equivalent Polish article (w:pl:Wybory prezydenckie w Polsce w 2025 roku) also has removed protection, so I think it’s fine to lower the protection of 2025 Polish presidential election as well.

Thank you, 83.28.53.192 (talk) 07:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I decided to fix up the stub, and in hopes of removing the stub tag, do you believe the current article looks good enough to remove the stub tag? (You created it way back) Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 18:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you pulled the DYK hook for Urien this morning. I think it is helpful to inform involved editors if there are problems with a hook, so I did so at Talk:Urien#DYK hook pulled. TSventon (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect EHarmony Video Bio has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 7 § EHarmony Video Bio until a consensus is reached. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 14:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Malcolm the Tenth has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 8 § Malcolm the Tenth until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:07, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend,

here: [2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Veterans%27_monument_in_Darlington,_Pennsylvania.jpg. If you have time, could you please take a photo of the company that made this monument. Usually, the few companies molded their name on the base in small print. It may be elsewhere. It would be nice to attribute to a specific company and town that moulded this monument. Thank you, — Ooligan (talk) 00:27, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At Redemption movement, you made the exact edit I was about to make–adding a comma. When I went into editing mode, the comma was there! I did have the article open for about a day before I got around to reading it, though. Cheers. David10244 (talk) 06:10, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hurricane Kristy (2024) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Talk:Hurricane Kristy (2024). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drdpw (talk) 01:34, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I asked to be blocked to run a test (see [[WP:AN#PBLOCK_me_for_testing]]), and I’m done with the test.}}

Is this template correct for a partial block? If there are syntax errors, or if something else is wrong, please let me know. Nyttend (talk) 23:49, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. I just found that I’m able to un-partialblock myself. Nyttend (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend (talk) 03:59, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Could you PBLOCK me from User:Nyttend/testrjehtunrinetdngrm please, for 24 hours? Almost done with block testing, but there’s one thing I forgot previously. Please disable autoblock, since it’s a technical testing block, not something meant to prevent disruption 🙂 Nyttend (talk) 10:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. (Hope I did that right – if not, squeal!) Once your block expires, behave yourself, or the next block will have to be indef. 🙂 DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hosue has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 17 § Hosue until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I pinged you at the help desk. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Su ošta? Èöštasotamàð? Ið ützçomg sek dyçötafuje ic çüm mašllogcúk ošäš, ic meb siejx 2603:8000:CD00:2E1:5137:7A81:1F60:6040 (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, what? Is this gibberish? The letter ð is pretty much restricted to Germanic languages, which don’t look like this — š looks Slavic, and the combination of ç and ü looks Turkish. Nyttend (talk) 08:23, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Turkmen perhaps? —Fortuna, imperatrix 11:42, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m super confused, why were my answers here reverted? you can delete this after notifying me, I just don’t know who else to contact. Sarefo (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me understand why you removed my CSD? If you check the transclusions you will see it is unused. I personally handled all of the conversions which is why I put the CSD on it. – Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:00, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The age of the redirect is not a factor when applying WP:X3; consensus has been that these redirects should be deleted regardless of age. (The point of WP:X3 is to avoid flooding WP:RFD with old redirects where there is consensus to delete.) Helpful Raccoon (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I wanted to leave you a direct message regarding the tfd discussion for Template:Infobox Australian place. For starters let me say I have huge respect for you as an editor. For one thing you’re an administrator, but you have also helped me out in the past and corrected my errors in the past. So I wanted to start by acknowledging that.

A LOT of work has gone into this recent iteration of Infobox Australian place. It is NOT a true merger, nor is it a deletion. It is a conversion. Your point that the TFD starts with Propse merging is totally a valid one. That is because I used WP:TWINKLE to initiate the TFD and it only gives 2 options, delete or merge. I should have read it more carefully and clarified from the get go. I have corrected that error with a strike and replacement text. I will just point out that the 2nd sentence of the TFD states It is time for this template to be converted to be a wrapper for Template:Infobox settlement (emphasis added).

Anyway, let me be clear, with the conversion, ALL information is retained. There is not, at this point, any advocating for removal of information that is important to Australian places. Same goes for all the customization of displaying maps and LGAs, rainfall, etc. (full disclosure there are some kinks still being worked out with the maps, but nothing that can’t be figured out).

What this does it modernize the template, eliminating things like hard coded conversion such as {{rnd|{{{area}}}/2.589988110336|1}} to convert the area from km2 to sq mi in favor of more modern approaches. It also unifies the templates look and feel to be like the other 576,000+ settlement pages on Wikipedia.

I’m sure that as an admin you have other projects you are working on, but can I please implore you to take some time to really look at the testcases? If you have specific objections to how something is being displayed or objections to how things are being implemented, I/we 100% want to hear that! A number of people (including Innesw & Joy as well as a number of Australian editors which I am not) have found issues. Some of them were typos, some of them were just my lack of understanding about Australia. I really want to hear this feedback so that we can improve the template. I just ask that you please don’t rubber stamp this as just another attempt at the same thing. I really did my homework and tried to address the issues raised in previous TFDs.

Thanks for hearing me out! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:38, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]