User talk:Palli Thev Pasanga: Difference between revisions

 

Line 53: Line 53:

:Hi Palli Thev Pasanga, you are correct that [[1987 Vanniyar reservation agitation]] is covered under the extended confirmed restriction in [[WP:CT/SASG]], and I have protected the article accordingly. Since the extended confirmed restriction also disallows editors who are not extended confirmed from filing requests for pages covered by the restriction, please leave future enforcement requests to extended confirmed editors. Thank you. —&nbsp;””'[[User:Newslinger|<span style=”color:#536267;”>Newslinger</span>]]”’&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style=”color:#708090;”>talk</span>]]</small>” 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

:Hi Palli Thev Pasanga, you are correct that [[1987 Vanniyar reservation agitation]] is covered under the extended confirmed restriction in [[WP:CT/SASG]], and I have protected the article accordingly. Since the extended confirmed restriction also disallows editors who are not extended confirmed from filing requests for pages covered by the restriction, please leave future enforcement requests to extended confirmed editors. Thank you. —&nbsp;””'[[User:Newslinger|<span style=”color:#536267;”>Newslinger</span>]]”’&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style=”color:#708090;”>talk</span>]]</small>” 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

== October 2025 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:JalenBarks|JalenBarks]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/Palli Thev Pasanga|your recent contributions]]—specifically <span class=”plainlinks”>[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thamma&diff=1318131323 this edit]</span> to [[:Thamma]]—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]] or the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|Help desk]]. Thanks. <!– Template:Huggle/warn-1 –><!– Template:uw-vandalism1 –>[[User:JalenBarks|<span style=”font-size:1.2em;font-family:eurofurence;background:#368ec9;color:white”>Jalen Barks</span>]] [[User talk:JalenBarks|<span style=”background:#6babd6;color:black”>(Woof)</span>]] 02:58, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to IPod Touch (7th generation) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

நீ ஒரு வெள்ளாளர் சாதியை சேர்ந்தவன். ராமதாஸ் வெள்ளாளர் பட்டத்தை தேவேந்திர குல சமூகத்திற்குக்கு வாங்கி கொடுத்து விட்டார் என்ற ஒற்றை காரணத்தால் உமக்கு ராமதாஸ் மீது கோபம் இருக்கலாம், அதை நான் ஏற்கிறேன், ஆனால் நீ ஒத்து மொத்த வன்னியர் சமூகத்தின் மீது எல்லை மீறிய அளவில் வெறுப்பை காட்டுவது ஏன் என்று தெரியவில்லை. இவ்வளவு நாட்கள் என்னால் உன் வாழ்க்கை போய் விடக்கூடாது என்ற ஒற்றை காரணத்தால் உன் மீது நான் எந்த வித நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்க என்மனம் முன்வரவில்லை, இது ஒன்றே காரணம்.. நானும் சரி நீங்களும் திருந்துவீர்கள், திருந்துவீர்கள் என்று இருந்தேன். ஆனால் நீயோ எல்லை மீறி போகிறாய்..மன்னிக்கவும் உன்மீது என் துறை ரீதியாக விழுப்புரம் காவல் கண்காணிப்பாளர் திரு. ப. சரவணன் அவர்களிடம் புகார் கொடுத்து விட்டோம். இது வரை நீங்கள் உபயோகித்த அத்தனை ip address and fake name அனைத்தையும், தற்போது நீங்கள் உபயோகிக்கும் இந்த பெயர் முதல் அனைத்தையும் சமர்ப்பணம் செய்து விட்டோம்.. வினை விதைத்தவன் வினை அருப்பான்.. இனி உங்கள் வாழ்க்கை உங்கள் கையில்.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gowtham Sampath (talk • contribs) 17:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller, This user claims that he has filed a legal case against me because he found my edit on Ramadoss offensive when it wasn’t. If I am not wrong, legal threats are not allowed on Wikipedia. I went through his edit history and found that he has a history of blackmailing people with legal threats and he always writes threats in Tamil so that he can evade the attention of admins. You can use Google or any other reliable translation tool to verify the distasteful comment that he left on my talk page.

Please ban him from the website forever. He is a threat to the Wikipedia editor community. Palli Thev Pasanga (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

நான் அச்சுரத்தல் எல்லாம் செய்யவில்லை, உங்கள் மீது உண்மையாகவே புகார் கொடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. நான் இவ்வளவு நான் எவ்வளவு decentaa சொன்னேன், ஆனால் நீயோ??? ஆனால் நீ இன்னும் நிர்வாகிய பிடிச்சி தொங்கிகிட்டு இருக்க??? என்னைய block பண்ண??? Gowtham Sampath (talk) 02:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller, He is doubling down and seems to have no regret for his bullying behaviour. Please ban him.

@Gowtham Sampath, You are not going far with the case. Police have far more important things to do than pander to your childish tantrums. Palli Thev Pasanga (talk) 02:56, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

எது என் பயனர் கணக்கில் வந்து low caste pallinu சாதி பெயர் சொல்லுவா, நான் குழந்தை தனமா யோசிக்கிறேனா?? Gowtham Sampath (talk) 03:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for the legal threat. Doug Weller talk 07:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller talk 07:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure you note the area in which you must not edit yet. This includes talk pages. Doug Weller talk 07:18, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Newslinger talk 07:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Palli Thev Pasanga, please remember that South Asian social groups (defined as “social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal”) are under the extended confirmed restriction. This means you are not allowed to make edits about South Asian social groups on Wikipedia until your account is extended confirmed, which will automatically happen when you make a total of 500 edits on your account. There are currently 56 edits in your edit history, so you are not yet eligible to make edits in this topic area. However, as an exception, you may submit constructive edit requests related to South Asian social groups on article talk pages.

In your edit Special:Diff/1313516036, you added the phrase “low caste” to an article, and in Special:Diff/1315203580, you re-added the text “Both criminals belonged to his own community – low caste Palli“. These edits are prohibited by the extended confirmed restriction, but even if your account were extended confirmed, these edits would still be inappropriate because they are unsourced statements in a biography of a living person. Additionally, the “low caste” descriptor (in particular) comes across as inflammatory, especially when it is unclear (due to the lack of reliable sourcing) why the Palli caste warrants a mention in the article at all.

I am posting here because Minakshi Pillai brought your edit Special:Diff/1316241503 to my attention on my talk page at User talk:Newslinger § User:Palli Thev Pasanga. Your edit, which contains the sentence “I want to collaborate with you on enriching articles related to low caste Pallis”, was also prohibited by the extended confirmed restriction, which applies to all edits about South Asian social groups on all Wikipedia pages. Once again, I am not sure why you mentioned “low caste” in your comment, as it appears to be unnecessary when the term “Pallis” by itself would have sufficed. Please remember that other editors are people who may be associated with a caste, or who may know others who are associated with a caste; referring to a community as “low caste” in a comment to another editor, when not needed or justified by the context, falls short of the “consideration and respect“ that the civility policy requires of all editors.

This message is a warning against violating the extended confirmed restriction on the subtopic of South Asian social groups, and has been recorded in the arbitration enforcement log. Please ensure that your future edits in the South Asia contentious topic comply with all applicable policies, guidelines, and topic area restrictions. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thank you for your message. I didn’t mention “low caste” out of malice. I mentioned it to disambiguate as “Palli” could mean different communities.

One question – Can I participate in talk pages and debate/discuss on contentious edits in caste related pages, even if I am not allowed to contribute to the main articles? Can I persuade/discuss with extended users to help them contribute to main articles? Palli Thev Pasanga (talk) 14:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying. Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Extended confirmed restriction (WP:ECR) for the specific details of the extended confirmed restriction, which are very strict. Aside from constructive edit requests on article talk pages (i.e. pages that begin with “Talk:”), no other edits about South Asian social groups are allowed on any Wikipedia page while your account is not extended confirmed. This means you are not allowed to participate in caste-related discussions or debates, regardless of whether the other participants are extended confirmed, until your account is extended confirmed.I understand that the restriction is inconvenient because it overlaps with many subjects in the South Asia topic area, but the English Wikipedia community has been having difficulty keeping disruptive caste-related edits under control, and the Arbitration Committee has determined that the restriction is the best way to encourage policy compliance in this topic area at this time. — Newslinger talk 15:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Newslinger, Hi. I have a actual question. Does this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_Vanniyar_reservation_agitation, fall under the restricted pages for a registered user under 500 edits? While it seems it falls under restricted pages ( caste-related topics) for users like me, from your earlier messages, it seems another user – @Minakshi Pillai, has been editing on this page even though they haven’t crossed the 500 edit limit . While I am interested on editing this page, I refrain from doing so to avoid violation of the restriction on me. Or am I overthinking? Can I contribute on this page like @Minakshi Pillai doing? Palli Thev Pasanga (talk) 02:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Palli Thev Pasanga, you are correct that 1987 Vanniyar reservation agitation is covered under the extended confirmed restriction in WP:CT/SASG, and I have protected the article accordingly. Since the extended confirmed restriction also disallows editors who are not extended confirmed from filing requests for pages covered by the restriction, please leave future enforcement requests to extended confirmed editors. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m JalenBarks. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Thamma—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Barks (Woof) 02:58, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]