User talk:Pancras Hogendoorn: Difference between revisions

Line 157: Line 157:

<div style=”border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]]

I’ve left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Oswald Vander Veken Prize]]. Thanks! [[User:Mgp28|Mgp28]] ([[User talk:Mgp28|talk]]) 15:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC) </div>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Oswald Vander Veken Prize|Oswald Vander Veken Prize]] (December 13) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Nil NZ was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />

* ”[[WP:Notability#General notability guideline|in-depth]]” (not just passing mentions about the subject)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|”independent”]] of the subject <br />

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

—

–> The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=I concur with {{noping|Mgp28}}’s assessment; I’m unfortunately not seeing enough coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:Independent]] to the awards or award winners.

We’d need to see [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] that’s ”not” from FWO/FRS, or from the award winners (and their institutions).}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Oswald Vander Veken Prize]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Oswald_Vander_Veken_Prize ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nil_NZ&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oswald_Vander_Veken_Prize ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Nil NZ|<span style=”font-family:Cooper Black;letter-spacing:1px;font-size:110%;color:#A7D335″><b>Nil</b></span>]][[User talk:Nil NZ|🥝]] 03:04, 13 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Thanks for your contributions to Paul Ernst (pathologist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit for review” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will add references. Also found a photograph to add and a painting. Give me some time. Pancras Hogendoorn (talk) 07:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pancras Hogendoorn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia’s content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Ernst (pathologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 21:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pancras Hogendoorn!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pancras Hogendoorn. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Paul Ernst“.

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 23:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was published a while ago after being reviewed by an editor, so I guess it is settled as a permanent contribution now. Correct? Pancras Hogendoorn (talk) 13:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there was a draft version (last edited in November) as well as the version now in mainspace at Paul Ernst (pathologist), perhaps as a result of a copy and paste move rather than the proper process. I think you can safely ignore the automated message above. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgp28 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the articles references appear to be to work that led to recipients winning the award. The articles do not say anything about the award itself. The few references that do discuss the award are from the organisation that awards it. To show that the prize is notable by Wikipedia criteria you need multiple independent sources (i.e. not from people awarding or receiving the prize).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Mgp28 (talk) 07:06, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PunjabiEditor69 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

– PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:48, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:44, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Nil🥝 03:04, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment