|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>
|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Automated Fault Analysis System|Automated Fault Analysis System]] (December 27) ==
<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. ”Reliable” sources are required so that information can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]]. If you need help with referencing, please see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]] and [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|Citing sources]].|}}<!–
—
–> The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Thank you for adding 2 sources, which is a definite step in the right direction, but it still means that most of the contents are unsourced, and another editor would be within their rights to delete most of the article. 6 paragraphs are unsourced. Now quality is more important than quantity, but there needs to be at least a few more reliable sources added to support the text.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Automated Fault Analysis System]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.
* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Automated_Fault_Analysis_System ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ChrysGalley&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Automated_Fault_Analysis_System ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].
[[User:ChrysGalley|ChrysGalley]] ([[User talk:ChrysGalley|talk]]) 13:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Very little in the way of secondary sources. Please also write in prose, not bullet points.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 |
Hello, Pierre75000!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 18:34, 18 August 2025 (UTC) |
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was: The comment the reviewer left was:
Thank you for adding 2 sources, which is a definite step in the right direction, but it still means that most of the contents are unsourced, and another editor would be within their rights to delete most of the article. 6 paragraphs are unsourced. Now quality is more important than quantity, but there needs to be at least a few more reliable sources added to support the text.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
