User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Please let me know if the editors take into accout references on Jan Zarzycki \

Hübner, Ralph, ed. (2004). “Jan Zarzycki”. Who is who w Polsce : leksykon biograficzny z ok. 13.750 nowymi wprowadzeniami, z ok. 4.550 zmianami i z ok. 24.800 wymienionymi nazwiskami znanych polskich osobistości, częściowo ze zdjęciami. Hübners Blaues Who is Who (in Polish). Vol. [Cz. 1, A-Mal ], [Cz. 2, Mał-Ż]. CH-6304 Zug, Alpenstraße 16: Who is Who, Verlag für Personenenzyklopädien AG /założone przez Ralpha Hübnera. p. 2531 s. : il., nuty, portr. ; 22 cm + płyta CD. ISBN 3729000438.

and new, not seen in pl wiki art

1. “Mathematics Genealogy Project“. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
2. Zarzycki, Jan (2000). “List of publication in MathSciNet”. MathSciNet. Retrieved 2021-02-19.
3. Zarzycki, Jan (2000). “Publication reviewed in zbMATH”. zbMATH Open. Retrieved 2021-02-19.

Recorded publications in the field of applications of mathematics show that JZ has not only engineering results but also mathematics.

Additionally, Zarzycki is full professor which is not so often and it is not comparable with professor position exept very special professorship in US.

Recognition that serving as dean for two terms should be sufficient in conjunction with the title of professor from the President of the Republic of Poland. During JZ’s tenure, nominations were preceded by elections. Winning the nomination meant that the candidate had demonstrated his or her many talents, skills, and knowledge.

I don’t know if JZ needs this article, but it, this article, is certainly needed by academics from European Union countries to understand the organization of science in other countries. This is the primary purpose of publishing this type of text on Wikipedia. It does not serve as a showcase for the person we are writing about.

KSz at OWPTM (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KSz at OWPTM If you want others to see your message there, make sure to ping them there (WP:ECHO). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 @Russ Woodroofe @Bearian In the case of the cited who’s who, the publication of the biographies is not associated with a fee (or any other type of financial extortion). There are opportunities to purchase a deluxe edition or poster associated with this publication. I’ve noticed that the publishing house has likely disappeared—which can be linked to the development of Wikipedia and the internet.

BTW -MR & zbMAth: THAT’S not as simple as this sentence claim. Most entries in zbMath and MR(MathSciNEt) are abstracts of the mentioned paper (not all published article are there – Only from recognized mathematical journals.). However, there are peer-reviewed papers, and these have the author’s opinions. Recording an engineer’s results in the database of mathematical results is a significant distinction—as long as they are peer-reviewed.

SCOPUS and Web of Science should not be confused with papers/ journals in zbMath and MR.

KSz at OWPTM (talk) 10:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the page has already been deleted, with the admin making the comment:

The result was delete. Already two AFDs for this subject in one year, let’s not make it 3 Ldm1954 (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 @Russ Woodroofe @Bearian Supervising doctoral theses during Zarzycki’s active years was not the same as earning a doctorate after doctoral school or doctoral studies. Obtaining the title of professor required, in addition to significant research results, also supervising students—which was equivalent to supervising a doctoral dissertation. Zarzycki’s career path certainly meets the requirements of a “distiguish professor.”

KSz at OWPTM (talk) 10:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KSz at OWPTM My talk page is not the right venue to continue this discussion; you could try Wikipedia:Deletion review. Although I don’t think you’ll have much luck unless you can find better sources discussing Zarzycki’s importance. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:04, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice and understanding.

I’m not entirely comfortable navigating this maze of procedures, even though I have experience with other IT-supported publishing systems.

I don’t know how to run Wikipedia:Deletion review. Have I study one semester course to do that?

I responded directly to the editor who deleted the article.User talk:Liz#Jan Zarzycki

I recently found an article about Faddeev. It’s in several languages—but even though he’s dead, we still don’t see the magnitude of his discoveries. How the Wiki’s Editors is able to evaluate the person better than at least 4(professorship)+3(habilitation)+2 (PhD)=9 reviewers? In case of Faddeev his great achievement on several pages of one forgotten article.

I don’t know if what I did is recoverable, because if not, I think I’ll ban myself from Wikipedia.

KSz at OWPTM (talk) 17:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KSz at OWPTM If you mean your Zarzycki article, you can use the procedure mentioned above, or ask Liz, do WP:USERFY it for you.

I don’t know who Faddev is. You can always try to write an article about them. If there is an article about him, it is a strong indication of notability. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:01, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Russian sabotage operations in Europe at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination’s entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Boud (talk) 12:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the edit conflict – I did a few full-article edits rather than section edits, because for changing from numeric ref labels that’s easier … Boud (talk) 13:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Boud No need to be sorry, it’s always a pleasure to see someone pay attention, and provide friendly and constructive criticism 🙂 When you are done with this, can you take a look at my sabotage in World War II, where I also used similar AI copyediting tools? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]