User talk:Prcjenna: Difference between revisions

 

 

Line 21: Line 21:

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Trillium College|Trillium College]] (September 16) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. ”Reliable” sources are required so that information can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]]. If you need help with referencing, please see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]] and [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|Citing sources]].|}}<!–

–>{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />

* [[WP:ORGDEPTH|”in-depth”]] (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[WP:ORGIND|”strictly independent”]] of the subject <br />

Make sure you add references that meet ”all four” of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Firstly, this is just an online brochure, telling us what the college does, where it’s located, etc. We’re not interested in that. We want to see what independent and reliable secondary sources have said about it.

Secondly, the sources are all primary, which cannot establish notability per [[WP:NCORP]].

And thirdly, the citations point to website home pages, which don’t (in most cases, at least) verify anything in this draft. You need to point to the specific URL where there is content that corroborates what is said in this draft; or rather, content based on which this draft has been composed.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Trillium College]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Trillium_College ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Trillium_College ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:58, 16 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:37, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, Prcjenna!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:37, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:58, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top