User talk:Prosnu: Difference between revisions

Here’s wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Prosnu! I see that you’ve already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don’t already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 21:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Saudis, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Please don’t switch out information like numbers without also changing the sources, and please make sure you are using reliable sources (Twitter is self-published/social media and thus not reliable for Wikipedia’s purposes). Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prosnu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. “Minor edit” has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 23:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Foreign relations of Saudi Arabia into Foreign relations of South Korea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia’s content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia’s licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you’ve copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:New Palestinian Passport.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 14:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dibyaza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In relation to your edits in Guadalquivir, given that Seybold’s Glossarium and R. Martí’s Vocabulista include wādī and wād under the meaning of riuus or flumen, it is my understanding that river (río) should prevail as translation of ‘wādī’ in the context of hydronyms from Andalusi Arabic whenever specialised sources say so, irrespective of other (more common?) meanings in any other context. Regards.–Asqueladd (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Azerbaijani language, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you’ve added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Gimel

added a link pointing to Punjabi alphabet

Qoph

added a link pointing to Punjabi alphabet

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Baal, you may be blocked from editing. Sinclairian (talk) 13:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just adding the Arabic names to the pages which are part of the Arabian culture, the Nabateans were Arabs and their Arabic names clearly shows that, how is it that their names are written in Greek when they spoke Nabatean Arabic as a native language and you are not allowing me to put up their names

and Baal was part of ancient Syria so why the name is only in Hebrew? and not in Arabic as well and if not why not in Aramaic? do you have an issue with the Arabic language?

I did not change the information or altered it, so please show me the reason why not to add Arabic names? Prosnu (talk) 13:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I have explained to you several times – Baal is not notably attested to in Arabic sources. He was not worshipped by Arabians, and his name is not found in Arabia outside of the generic noun ba’l to denote “master”. Hebrew is not the only name listed for Baal, there is an explanatory footnote in the first sentence of the article which shows the name “Baal” is every relevant language, including Ugaritic and Phoenician – the languages spoken by the people who worshipped Baal in the first place. Likewise, as I said before, the only reason the Hebrew ba’al is listed outside of that explanatory footnote is because it is the direct etymological source for the English term “Baal”, considering that Hebrew is the only Semitic language which doubled the a to produce Ba’al instead of Ba’l.

As for the Nabataeans, they neither spoke Modern Arabic nor wrote in the Arabic alphabet, so while they may have been of Arabic stock, you can’t just add the Modern Arabic name for the kings, considering they also had Aramaic names and only officially left Aramaic inscriptions, we do not know what form or pronunciation their names would have had in their native Nabataean Arabic language.

I hope this clears up any residual confusion. Sinclairian (talk) 15:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has been established that the Nabateans spoke Arabic as their native language, there is a type of Arabic poetry called Nabatean Poetry which is used in the Arabian Peninsula’s modern music, so I can’t understand how adding an Arabic name to an “Arabian” Semitic king’s page is going to have a historical issue while adding their “Greek” name is important, the region was even called “””Arabia””” Petraea during Roman times.

Their Arabic names are not a translation of Aramaic but clearly of Arabic origin, Arabic was already part of their language and Arabic is a language continuum, Modern Arabic is based on Classical and Old Arabic, it is not based on Modern Dialects

Arabic and Aramaic are both Semitic languages and Arabic is the modern prevalent language in all of the former Middle Eastern Semitic regions including Levant, Mesopotamia and Arabian Peninsula and these people speak Arabic nowadays. Prosnu (talk) 16:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Prosnu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dibyaza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Prosnu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Dibyaza“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Bogazicili. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Konya, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bogazicili (talk) 16:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Palestinian Passport.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Al-Andalus into Mediterranean Sea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia’s content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia’s licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you’ve copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Richard Yin. I noticed that you recently removed content from Arabic without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Richard Yin (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Languages of Palestine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SABIC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naskh.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Noted, thank you, fixed Prosnu (talk) 20:04, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Palestinian Passport.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 18:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nabataean Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed-Deir.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Cave of the Patriarchs, you may be blocked from editing. Sinclairian (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add personal commentary, the mosque is called المسجد الإبراهيمي almasjid alibrahīmi in Arabic, go check the Arabic resources and it is located in the West Bank, Palestine as per International law, I added Palestine to confirm it’s place

Arabic should come before Modern Hebrew based on two criteria:

1-the official language in Palestine is Arabic only and most of the natives only speak Palestinian Arabic

2-Alphabetically

I’m basing my edits based on international law and Arabic knowledge, not personal analysis, changing the narrative and wording to fit the zionist or any political point of view should not be tolerated in Wikipedia Prosnu (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Prosnu, I advise you to avoid making edits advocating for political or social causes. Wikipedia maintains a neutral point of view. Therefore, an article about a Perso-Arabic letter isn’t related to debates about the originality of Hebrew city names in the Levant. Thanks and happy editing. —Esperfulmo (talk) 03:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote the edit in a neutral point of view, most signs in Israel are transcribing the Hebrew city names to Arabic alphabet not adding the Arabic names, I gave the example of the name نوف هچليل instead of the correct Arabic name الناصرة العليا [n 2019 the city was renamed Nof HaGalil (Hebrew: נוֹף הַגָּלִיל‎, lit. View of the Galilee)]

They also use the name أورشليم Urshalim in their road signs and write Quds between two brackets, is اورشليم the correct Arabic name? that’s why I added “transcribing Hebraized place names” Prosnu (talk) 03:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are many other names which are originally Hebrew and use the چ for ג. It’s not about changing Arabic names or which is original. There are endless other city names which were changed to Arabic in other countries, including in Egypt, but an article about a letter is not the right place to mention such a thing. —Esperfulmo (talk) 04:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just linked it to the article “Hebraization of Palestinian place names”, I did not discuss any political point of view in this article, which is the new practice of using one-to-one correspondence to the Hebrew pronunciation after Hebraizing the name of cities which happened with the city I mentioned Prosnu (talk) 04:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Semitic languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Arabian languages.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Turkmen language and Turkmen grammar have been removed in whole or in part, as it appears you added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Umayyad architecture. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article’s talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 22:57, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Prosnu, have you read the message above and do you understand it? R Prazeres (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Prosnu: can you please answer the direct question I posed to you above? (You’ve been responding everywhere else, so surely you’ve had a chance to see this.) Otherwise, it gives the distinct impression that you are ignoring this because you intend to keep edit-warring, or you don’t understand any of it. In both cases, sadly, this means your behaviour probably needs to be reported to administrators. Please respond and let me know if something is unclear about the edit-warring policy. R Prazeres (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not edit the Umayyad article anymore what are you talking about? I have replied to you in that page and I have explained my point, we are still discussing there, I did not reject your opinion Prosnu (talk) 20:48, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Umayyad architecture has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:51, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Prosnu, on a related note to the above: when you directly copy material from one article to another, as you did at Umayyad dynasty (by copying from Umayyad architecture and other articles), you also need to provide attribution in your edit summary. Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia to learn how this works. R Prazeres (talk) 23:50, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Umayyad architecture has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Flag of Syria. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 05:13, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you edit articles about the Levant. Just wanted to let you know that there is an effort to launch a new edition of Wikipedia in Levantine Arabic (Syrian-Lebanese dialect). It is in the Wikimedia Incubator now and the project will be launched if there are enough contributors. Let me know if you are interested to learn more. Thanks. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 02:42, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for considering me, but to be honest these dialect Wikipedias’ are very badly written like the Moroccan one and the Egyptian one, they are too informal and sometimes written from 1st person, with too many personal descriptions and one point views and bad Arabization Prosnu (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Moorish architecture and Template:Arabic culture. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article’s talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Note that this is your second warning about this in less than two weeks. R Prazeres (talk) 22:22, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are trying to erase the word Arab from any topic about Moors, and trying to diminish the rule of the Umayyads who established Alandalus and ruled it from 711 to 1031, how is it Islamic Middle Eastern style? so when it comes to Arabs it’s Islamic but Berbers had their own traiditons and architecture, This is clearly a Berbersit move (anti-Arab) Prosnu (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. R Prazeres (talk) 00:32, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the oldest mosques, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Umayyad state of Córdoba, you may be blocked from editing. You have also introduced a copyright violation for the 4th time now (at Moorish architecture, despite three warnings above. This is likely to be your last warning about these issues before you are reported at WP:ANI. I would strongly recommend you change the type of edits you make or change the topics you edit in order to avoid these mistakes. R Prazeres (talk) 15:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Beqaa Valley

added a link pointing to Anjar

List of mosques in China

added a link pointing to Songjiang

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Umayyad Mosque of Mosul. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. R Prazeres (talk) 00:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of oldest mosques. R Prazeres (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the information mentioned in the “List of the oldest mosques” is already cited in each mosque’s main article, and how is Hagia Sofia mosque under the Southwest Asia mosques!, when it’s situated in the European part of Istanbul and it not even in par in history with the other mentioned mosques Prosnu (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you’ve made to Baghdad. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. This is at least your third warning about this behaviour; if you continue, it will be reported to administrators. R Prazeres (talk) 20:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m GenoV84. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Destruction of early Islamic heritage sites in Saudi Arabia, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 19:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t leave a reliable source because these sources are unreliable, I explained my edit, like the manaratain mosque is still in Medina and it’s mentioned as demolished!, and the Ajyad Fort is not religious site in any way, some mosques mentioned never existed in the first place, really badly written Prosnu (talk) 19:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Syrian Turkmen, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 22:27, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]