User talk:Raigar-RST: Difference between revisions

 

Line 118: Line 118:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!– Template:Afd notice –></div> [[User:Wikiman2230|<span style=”color:red;”>”’Wikiman”'</span>]] ([[User talk: Wikiman2230|talk]]) 16:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!– Template:Afd notice –></div> [[User:Wikiman2230|<span style=”color:red;”>”’Wikiman”'</span>]] ([[User talk: Wikiman2230|talk]]) 16:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:धर्म गुरु स्वामी ज्ञान स्वरूप महाराज]]==

[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]

{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}

A tag has been placed on [[:धर्म गुरु स्वामी ज्ञान स्वरूप महाराज]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#G12|section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the page appears to be an unambiguous [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|copyright infringement]]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ”information”, but not as a source of ”sentences”. This part is crucial: ”say it in your own words”. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators ”’will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]”’.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ”must” verify that externally by one of the processes explained at [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]]. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]] for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|Wikipedia’s copyright policy]] for more details, or ask a question [[Wikipedia:Help desk|here]].

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may ”’contest the nomination”’ by [[:धर्म गुरु स्वामी ज्ञान स्वरूप महाराज|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines]]. <!– Template:Db-copyvio-notice –><!– Template:Db-csd-notice-custom –> ”'[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:red”>WC</span>”<span style=”color:#999933″>Quidditch</span>”]]”’ [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:red”>☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style=”color:#999933″>✎</span>]] 16:27, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

A plate of chocolate chip cookies on a blue and white striped plate. The plate sits on a beige surface.
Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Raigar-RST! I’m HundredVisionsAndRevisions, and I’ve been assigned as your mentor. All new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I’m here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I’m glad you’re here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It’s recommended that you take advantage of this, as it’ll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the “Get editing help” button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! HundredVisionsAndRevisions (talk) 17:12, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in improving linking within Wikipedia. It must be done with care, however. On page Tofazzal Islam, the Department of Biotechnology at Gazipur Agricultural University (in Bangladesh) is not the Department of Biotechnology (a government department in India). —Worldbruce (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chhigan Lal Gusaiwal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 18:40, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kovcszaln6 were:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also remove external links from the body of the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, Raigar-RST!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:  The comment the reviewer left was:

See both WP:NAUTHOR and WP:BLP. No direct links inside the article, please. The likely route to notability here is “two books, two book reviews each”, under NAUTHOR. At the moment the notability and sourcing here is below the requirements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

ChrysGalley (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kovcszaln6 was:

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Articles for Creation help desk or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may also advise you to visit the help desk.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 14:06, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page धर्म गुरु स्वामी ज्ञान स्वरूप महाराज to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the list of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. Otherwise, we invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article may be listed for deletion. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:07, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiman (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on धर्म गुरु स्वामी ज्ञान स्वरूप महाराज requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia’s copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. WCQuidditch 16:27, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top