From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|
:::[[List of fascist movements]]. Good faith editing, no matter if it is disruptive, is ”’not [[WP:vandalism|vandalism]].”’ [[User:45dogs|45dogs]] <small> (they/them) [[User talk:45dogs|(talk page)]]</small> 06:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC) |
:::[[List of fascist movements]]. Good faith editing, no matter if it is disruptive, is ”’not [[WP:vandalism|vandalism]].”’ [[User:45dogs|45dogs]] <small> (they/them) [[User talk:45dogs|(talk page)]]</small> 06:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::::I am editing in good faith. Thanks for the message. [[User:Rangooner|Rangooner]] ([[User talk:Rangooner#top|talk]]) 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC) |
::::I am editing in good faith. Thanks for the message. [[User:Rangooner|Rangooner]] ([[User talk:Rangooner#top|talk]]) 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:::::I am referring to you calling other good faith edits vandalism. Please cease doing that. [[User:45dogs|45dogs]] <small> (they/them) [[User talk:45dogs|(talk page)]]</small> 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:48, 24 September 2025
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.
Important points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:38, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Also, at least from what I can see, none of the edits reverting you are vandalism. Please review WP:NOTVAND. Calling good faith editing vandalism could be considered a personal attack. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Care to elaborate? Which page are you referring to? Rangooner (talk) 06:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- List of fascist movements. Good faith editing, no matter if it is disruptive, is not vandalism. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- I am editing in good faith. Thanks for the message. Rangooner (talk) 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- I am referring to you calling other good faith edits vandalism. Please cease doing that. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- I am editing in good faith. Thanks for the message. Rangooner (talk) 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- List of fascist movements. Good faith editing, no matter if it is disruptive, is not vandalism. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Care to elaborate? Which page are you referring to? Rangooner (talk) 06:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)


