User talk:Rangooner: Difference between revisions

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:38, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, at least from what I can see, none of the edits reverting you are vandalism. Please review WP:NOTVAND. Calling good faith editing vandalism could be considered a personal attack. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Care to elaborate? Which page are you referring to? Rangooner (talk) 06:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of fascist movements. Good faith editing, no matter if it is disruptive, is not vandalism. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing in good faith. Thanks for the message. Rangooner (talk) 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am referring to you calling other good faith edits vandalism. Please cease doing that. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:48, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly reverting content on a page in a back-and-forth fashion to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this time is to stop editing the page and to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand with the other editors involved in the dispute. Wikipedia provides a page that helps to detail how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor’s work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts to the page.