User talk:Rangooner: Difference between revisions

Line 51: Line 51:

# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.}} <!– Template:uw-ew –> [[User:45dogs|45dogs]] <small> (they/them) [[User talk:45dogs|(talk page)]]</small> 06:38, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

:Also, at least from what I can see, ”’none”’ of the edits reverting you are vandalism. Please review [[WP:NOTVAND]]. Calling good faith editing vandalism could be considered a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. [[User:45dogs|45dogs]] <small> (they/them) [[User talk:45dogs|(talk page)]]</small> 06:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Rangooner! I noticed your contributions to List of fascist movements and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Qwerty123M (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rangooner, welcome. Could you please join the discussion on Talk:List_of_fascist_movements#US? Kind regards, Dajasj (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dajasj, thanks for reaching out. I’ve responded to your message. Rangooner (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Johnuniq (talk) 03:12, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to List of fascist movements while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia’s policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:49, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, not sure why I keep getting logged out 🙁 I’ll keep an eye on it Rangooner (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:38, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, at least from what I can see, none of the edits reverting you are vandalism. Please review WP:NOTVAND. Calling good faith editing vandalism could be considered a personal attack. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 06:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment