User talk:Rezakaisar91: Difference between revisions

Please stop editing pages with sources that do you support your edits. It is thought that the Lamborghini Jota was travelling in was a Urus, not an Aventador. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElsevierAnatomy (talk • contribs) 13:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group L, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:32, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2028 United Nations Security Council election requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:40, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wernli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 02:06, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there – Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn’t provide a source for your changes to the Roger Beck article, and I couldn’t find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 14:25, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Merpati Nusantara Airlines Flight 516 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merpati Nusantara Airlines Flight 516 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

11WB (talk) 23:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rezakaisar91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Otomotif for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn’t be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ckfasdf (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to SPAL. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. CNC (talk) 10:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Ars et Labor Ferrara, you may be blocked from editing. CNC (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from de:Adolf Labor to Adolf Darbo. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia’s licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution.
It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Sam Sailor 12:43, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page List of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2801 to 2900 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rezakaisar91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wernli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:10, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2028 UEFA European Under-19 Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 UEFA European Under-19 Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Vestrian24Bio 07:38, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Danners430. I noticed that you recently removed content from Juba International Airport without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:10, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reza, you cannot just add more languages’ names to places by virtue of their proximity other places. Shall we add English names to the districts of Jakarta simply because Indonesia is not-so-far away from Australia? Shall we add Burmese names to Aceh simply because Indonesia is also not-so-far away from Myanmar? Please stop. Mallfon (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is addressed to you, Reza. Read it. Mallfon (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect F-GGML has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9 § This redirect doesn’t seem to be related to the target article. The aircraft involved was VQ-BBN, F-GGML is a different airplane, I think. until a consensus is reached.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 5X-USM has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9 § Another one of these … this redirect doesn’t seem to be related to the target article. The aircraft involved was VQ-BBN. until a consensus is reached.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:21, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect PT-SSI has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9 § Another one of these … this redirect doesn’t seem to be related to the target article. The aircraft involved was VQ-BBN. until a consensus is reached.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect YR-BAB has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9 § YR-BAB until a consensus is reached. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on B-2591 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect has nothing to do with the target page.