User talk:Rhain: Difference between revisions

Line 78: Line 78:

Your [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article nomination]] of the article [[Through the Valley (The Last of Us)]] is [[File:Time2wait.svg|20px|alt=|link=]] ”’under review”’. See ”'[[Talk:Through the Valley (The Last of Us)/GA1{{!}}the review page]]”’ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!– Template:GANotice default –> <!– Template:GANotice –> Message delivered by [[User:ChristieBot|ChristieBot]], on behalf of [[User:Vestrian24Bio|Vestrian24Bio]] — [[User:Vestrian24Bio|Vestrian24Bio]] ([[User talk:Vestrian24Bio|talk]]) 14:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

== February 2026 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann08]]. Thank you for your recent contributions to [[:Template:A Song of Ice and Fire television franchise episodes]]. When you were adding content to the page, you added [[Help:Duplicate parameters|duplicate arguments]] to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the [[Help:Show preview|preview]] button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks.<!—Template:Uw-dupargs—> ”'[[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann]]”’ ([[User_talk:Zackmann08|Talk to me]]/[[Special:Contributions/Zackmann08|What I been doing]]) 03:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Rhain! 🙂 Do you know how to fix the errors at List of most expensive television series? (the 2025 iflation ones) Timur9008 (talk) 06:25, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Easiest way is just to comment out the template for now, and replace it when {{Inflation}} is updated. It’s a shame these errors are showing again—there was a period where inputting “2025” still worked—but at least we have a solution. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 07:53, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 🙂 Timur9008 (talk) 08:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting it all i wanted to say this link about gta sa is much written at all and you should have added all that understood stuff since january 2024:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GTA:_San_Andreas&oldid=1331637954 Sapitanoa (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think Babysharkboss2 already summarised my thoughts perfectly. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 10:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhain! 🙂 I’ve been collecting sources on my sandbox for years now. (for companies, Rockstar, Naughty Dog, etc + other stuff)

Might be of some use to you to expand those pages User:Timur9008/sandbox.

These are not used in any articles to my knowledge. Timur9008 (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sharing! The Rockstar source is used on Grand Theft Auto III, per your recommendation, but the others look unused. Nice finds—I’m sure these will prove very useful! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 22:38, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, do you have any future plans to get the Last of Us Part II to FA? I am in the early stages of working on Horizon Zero Dawn and was looking at the original Last of Us article for some inspiration in some sections. I ended up at the Part II page and realized it was only a GA after thinking it was an FA for some reason. If you ever plan on doing it, I’d be happy to help where I can. — Zoo Blazer 08:02, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good to hear from you! It’s been almost a decade since my last FAC, so it’s not something I really think about much anymore; I tend to consider GA a pretty good finish line before moving on. That being said, if I was going to consider nominating an article, The Last of Us Part II is probably one of the most likely candidates. I have plans to (finally) finish its spinoff articles quite soon, so I may consider going for FA around that time, and will certainly let you know if I need help. Good luck with your work on Horizon Zero Dawn! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 08:31, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rhain,

This is Chris from People Make Games and I just wanted to say how much I appreciated you updating the wiki page for the New York Game Awards last night and then making the extra effort to add the award win to our page as well. That means an awful lot to a small team like us and I just wanted to let you know that your attention to detail is very much appreciated.

Best,

Chris ~2026-40207-6 (talk) 09:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris! I’m always happy to keep the New York Game Awards article updated, so it made sense to add the accolade to the People Make Games article as well. Congratulations on the achievement, and keep up the great work! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:49, 20 January 2026 (UTC) (P.S. If you ever need help researching obscure information, especially about video games, Wikipedia editors are a great place to start!) (P.P.S. Bring back The Games Press…)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Ark (Doctor Who) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant — Olliefant (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rhain, I hope you are well. This is the first article I have written myself from scratch (on enwiki). And since I based it on your article “When You’re Lost in the Darkness“, I would appreciate your opinion on whether you think it is ready to be submitted. Any advice or tips would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Franar8 (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Franar8: Good to hear from you! I’m honoured that you used some of my contributions as a guide. I won’t read too deeply to avoid spoilers, but at a quick glance it looks great—each section appears to have a solid amount of information, and the references are all reliable and prove notability. It looks ready for mainspace to me; you’ve done some great work! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 02:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Absolutiva 01:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A standard {{Alert}} would have sufficed this time (though I’ve made several AP edits in the past so I’m certainly well aware regardless), but thank you nonetheless. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:38, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Through the Valley (The Last of Us) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio — Vestrian24Bio (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Template:A Song of Ice and Fire television franchise episodes. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply