User talk:Rohith Kishan P: Difference between revisions

Line 79: Line 79:

:::as

:::Mammooty as superstar Ashok Raj, Balan’s childhood friend (extended cameo appearance) [[User:Rohith Kishan P|Rohith Kishan P]] ([[User talk:Rohith Kishan P#top|talk]]) 15:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

::::Being a prominent malayalam superstar doesn’t mean we change the cast order to place him higher. Again, we need multiple [[WP:RS|reliable]], [[WP:SECONDARY|secondary sources]] that prove a particular cast order, not an opinion. There have been many superstars in cinema around the world that have had cameos. Being famous and having a cameo doesn’t mean you get bumped up the cast order list here. It doesn’t work like that here. –[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 15:56, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malikappuram. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 02:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MakaylaHippo1998

ok. But why you keep false information in Wikipedia?? Rohith Kishan P (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rohith Kishan P – please note I undid your recent edit to Hridayapoorvam. You can use Template:Citation (or {{Citation |last= |first= |year= |title= |publisher= |publication-place= |page= |url= |access-date=}}) to cite a source so it appears in the reference list. Hope this helps! jellyfish ✉ 16:41, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellyfish

example? Rohith Kishan P (talk) 16:47, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing one off the infobox:

<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 August 2025 |title=""Hridayapoorvam'' (2025) |url=https://www.ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/7DB9292E0050454C |access-date=22 August 2025 |website=[[Irish Film Classification Office]]}}</ref>

jellyfish ✉ 16:49, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellyfish ഹൃദയപൂര്‍വം :സത്യൻ അന്തിക്കാട് സംവിധാനം ചെയ്ത മോഹൻലാലിൻ്റെ ഏറ്റവും പുതിയ ചിത്രമാണ് ഹൃദയപൂര്‍വം. വളരെ പ്രതീക്ഷയോടെയാണ് പ്രേക്ഷകര്‍ തീയേറ്ററിലെത്തിയത്. സമ്മിശ്ര പ്രതികരണമാണ് ചിത്രത്തിന് ലഭിച്ചത്. അവയവദാനമാണ് ചിത്രത്തിൻ്റെ പ്രമേയം. ജിയോ ഹോട്ട് സ്റ്റാറില്‍ സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 26ന് സ്ട്രീമിംഗ് ആരംഭിക്കും.

got from kairali news, as Mixed review arose for film. Rohith Kishan P (talk) 16:53, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Life of Josutty, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 00:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aadirulez8

No sources available. It is proved in several YouTube videos. Rohith Kishan P (talk) 02:32, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aadirulez8

He didn’t acted in the film. He was the assistant director. So by mistake, he was caught in a scene. Rohith Kishan P (talk) 02:35, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rohith,

That would not be considered as a prominent role to be mentioned at cast section. Please read MOS:FILMCAST

Thanks, Aadirulez8 (talk) 07:49, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aadirulez8

By screen presence, he is also added to the cast either as uncredited role or a brief cameo Rohith Kishan P (talk) 10:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to College Kumaran. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lokah Chapter 1: Chandra. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. The cameos aren’t listed as bullets. — Benison (Beni · talk) 15:14, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aadu (film). Shellwood (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shellwood

Im from kerala. The full name of the film is Aadu oru bheekara jeeviyaanu

(if edited, provides translation to it) Rohith Kishan P (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rohith Kishan P,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Benison (Beni · talk) 15:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you’ve added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Aadu 3

added a link pointing to 3D

Ekalavyan (film)

added a link pointing to IPS

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot

My suggestions

create Wikipedia pages for 2026 hindi film Ramayana, and malayalam movie Patriot Rohith Kishan P (talk) 01:26, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are constant arguments across a number of South Asian films about cast order. Katha Parayumpol is not immune to this. What you think the order should be is not what others think. The revert wars continue ad nauseum literally for years and years and years. I am reverting your change because it does not have consensus. Do not attempt to reinstate this material in this order again without gaining consensus to do so on the article’s talk page. If you have questions, let me know. Thanks, —Hammersoft (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft

My opinion ;not affects the content

Mammooty, though an extended cameo, makes the last five minutes more emotional, and makes Audience to cry. So, he must be added either first or second. Rohith Kishan P (talk) 15:43, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, your opinion doesn’t matter. This is part of the reason why there are near constant disputes over cast order. Lots of people have opinions. Sometimes people try to base their disagreement with cast orders based on credits order. But, some movies will have different cast orders based on where they are shown. There’s rarely a definitive answer as to what the “proper” cast order is. Even studios disagree with themselves over it. Unless you can provide reliable, secondary sources…and I do mean sources, not just a source, but preferable many sources…that provide an iron-clad support for the cast in a particular order, then it won’t stick. Opinions don’t have an effect on this. —Hammersoft (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft

Mammooty is a prominent malayalam superstar, so not to be included in between. Rohith Kishan P (talk) 15:50, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft

If so, can you add Mammooty as an extended cameo appearance, in brscket near to his role?

as normally did

Mammooty as superstar Ashok Raj, Balan’s childhood friend (extended cameo appearance) Rohith Kishan P (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Being a prominent malayalam superstar doesn’t mean we change the cast order to place him higher. Again, we need multiple reliable, secondary sources that prove a particular cast order, not an opinion. There have been many superstars in cinema around the world that have had cameos. Being famous and having a cameo doesn’t mean you get bumped up the cast order list here. It doesn’t work like that here. —Hammersoft (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply