User talk:Roshan Dickwella: Difference between revisions

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Trincomalee into Trincomalee District. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia’s content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia’s licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you’ve copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask why my edit on Katchatheevu was reverted? Were the sources I added unreliable or something? Did the wikilinks I added violate WP:OVERLINK? ZionniThePeruser (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was an unnecessary edit in my opinion. Especially removing details as such the king of Sri Lanka and St. Anthony’s Church. Roshan Dickwella (talk) 23:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m IDB.S. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Prasanna De Silva have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. IDB.S (talk) 03:32, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

use talk page at Malayalam before you make distruptive edits Ammamozhi (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you’ve made to Malayalam. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]