User talk:Roshan G. Ragel: Difference between revisions

To the administrators,

I understand I have been permanently blocked for violating the unblock agreement. I accept full responsibility for my actions.

I genuinely did not understand Wikipedia’s conflict of interest policies when I started. Professor Ragel asked me to help after winning a major IEEE award, and I thought it was acceptable to help create his article using reliable sources. I now understand this was wrong.

I violated the unblock agreement by continuing to edit after agreeing not to. I misunderstood what was being asked of me, but that is no excuse.

I accept the permanent block and will not attempt to circumvent it in any way. I will not create new accounts or edit from other devices.

If there is any path to redemption in the future (perhaps after 6-12 months of showing I understand the policies), I would appreciate guidance. But I understand if the answer is simply “no.”

I apologize to the administrators whose time I wasted, and I’ve learned valuable lessons about Wikipedia’s policies.

Thank you for your patience.

Roshan G. Ragel (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are not “permanently blocked”, suggesting there is no possibility of removal. You are indefinitely blocked, which only means that there is no specific end date and you must convince an administrator to remove it. You had an unblock request open to ask another administrator to review this matter, but you removed it. If you would like this considered, you need to restore your unblock request.

You will need to explain if either you 1) shared this account with Professor Ragel or 2) pretended to be him. 331dot (talk) 15:32, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]