== Declining of article about “Mauricio Jorge Yattah” ==
== Declining of article about “Mauricio Jorge Yattah” ==
You have provided an invalid reason for declining the article [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mauricio_Jorge_Yattah|Mauricio Jorge Yattah]]
You have provided an invalid reason for declining the article [[Draft:Mauricio_Jorge_Yattah|Mauricio Jorge Yattah]]
This submission’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)
This submission’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)
| SafariScribe is currently experiencing significant stress that may affect their ability to work on Wikipedia. They may choose to work in quieter areas and avoid complicated tasks or areas prone to conflict. They may also respond to talk page or email messages more slowly than usual, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
| Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
The world was created for all.
No one is perfect even AI’s do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!
If you are here just to castigated me (I know there shouldn’t be “d”, so it’s a mistake; fix it yourself), please don’t come here. Find anywhere in your talk page, then ping me for opinion. Welcome to my talk page, and ask questions as you will answer when it’s thrown to you. I have no other account and have never edited for any payment whatsoever.

The article Sex, Love, Misery: New New York has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable, see Talk page
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 02:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked, please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
The One! I’m sure your dream is to be a writer:) Saw what you did. I’m impressed. 9aija (talk) 16:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot’s talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you’ve edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot’s talk page. — SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to List of high schools in Anambra State. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jolielover♥talk 05:21, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello?? Please when an editor especially experienced one started a page like this, I normally advise that you give them a week to sort the page out. Didn’t you see it was labelled “dynamic list”? Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well, it hadn’t been edited by you for over an hour, was unreferenced, and didn’t have a lead. It was perfectly appropriate to draftify it. You can continue to work on the article in draft space, at least until the latter two issues are addressed. jolielover♥talk 05:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- No it wasn’t , @Jolielover. When you see an experienced editor do such, please leave the page for at least two days. There is no award given for draftifying a page please. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I didn’t realise you were an experienced editor, and anyway, I think it’s fair to treat everybody’s articles the same regardless of how long they’ve been here. I would’ve draftified it even if it was created by a brand new account. jolielover♥talk 05:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- You are getting it wrong. Being an NPPer, I know the best you should have done was to leave the tags; always give tags at least two days. Nobody is asking you to treat anybody badly or fairly. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I didn’t realise you were an experienced editor, and anyway, I think it’s fair to treat everybody’s articles the same regardless of how long they’ve been here. I would’ve draftified it even if it was created by a brand new account. jolielover♥talk 05:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- No it wasn’t , @Jolielover. When you see an experienced editor do such, please leave the page for at least two days. There is no award given for draftifying a page please. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well, it hadn’t been edited by you for over an hour, was unreferenced, and didn’t have a lead. It was perfectly appropriate to draftify it. You can continue to work on the article in draft space, at least until the latter two issues are addressed. jolielover♥talk 05:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi SS, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nigeria#Fixing the way Nigerian newspapers are cited, as your comment would be invaluable. Thanks. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot’s talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you’ve edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot’s talk page. — SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello, SafariScribe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Killbill Society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot’s talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you’ve edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot’s talk page. — SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi Safarscribe, My article of Padine Kumar has been recently accepted into an main article by you, however it has now been listed for deletion by other users. Could you please help me to keep that article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aishwaryaa1511 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Onitsha, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi SafariScribe. Thank you for your work on AIICO Insurance Plc. Another editor, Agent VII, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you. I have already de-orphaned by linking to existing articles that use this article name.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Agent 007 (talk) 19:14, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
You have provided an invalid reason for declining the article Mauricio Jorge Yattah
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)
as : Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians_and_judges
Yet this is demonstrably false. The article shows several *full features* published *in the most important national press*
which are *specifically about the subject in question*, for example: Perfil, Clarín (most important national newspaper), es:La Política Online (the links themselves are in the draft). There is also a feature in La Nación, the “newspaper of record”. These are full articles, published multiple times in national newspapers, which are fully and alone about the article’s subject, and are completely independent. This completely fulfills the notability guidelines, from Notability (people):
A politician who has received “significant press coverage” has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists
The requisite has been more than fulfilled, there is over half a dozen in depth articles exclusively and fully about the subject. HalfManLife (talk) 06:42, 15 September 2025 (UTC)



