User talk:Sanatnipandit: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


Line 3: Line 3:

[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[WP:Content removal|remove content or templates]] from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Bharatpur State]], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use [[User:Sanatnipandit/sandbox|your sandbox]] for that. Thank you.<!– Template:uw-delete2 –> [[User:AntiDionysius|<span style=”color:green”>AntiDionysius</span>]] (<span style=”font-variant:small-caps”>[[User talk:AntiDionysius|talk]]</span>) 15:24, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[WP:Content removal|remove content or templates]] from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Bharatpur State]], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use [[User:Sanatnipandit/sandbox|your sandbox]] for that. Thank you.<!– Template:uw-delete2 –> [[User:AntiDionysius|<span style=”color:green”>AntiDionysius</span>]] (<span style=”font-variant:small-caps”>[[User talk:AntiDionysius|talk]]</span>) 15:24, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop. If you continue to add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced or poorly sourced]] content, as you did at [[:Bharatpur State]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!– Template:uw-unsourced3 –> [[User:AntiDionysius|<span style=”color:green”>AntiDionysius</span>]] (<span style=”font-variant:small-caps”>[[User talk:AntiDionysius|talk]]</span>) 15:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

== History of Bharatpur ==

== History of Bharatpur ==


Revision as of 15:31, 2 February 2026

Hello, I’m Janan2025. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bharatpur State without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Janan2025 (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bharatpur State, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bharatpur State, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Which topic I’m removed this is a propaganda from Rajput. That’s not a real history. They try to defame jats history Sanatnipandit (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

AntiDionysius (talk) 15:29, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version