User talk:Sandro1041: Difference between revisions

Line 35: Line 35:

:You may find the advice at [[WP:ECREXPLAIN]] helpful. Please note that comments such as [[Special:Diff/1316279564]] violate the restriction, and that rapid-fire edits are likely to be seen as a form of [[WP:GAMING]]. Please slow down and learn your way around. signed, [[User:Rosguill|””’Rosguill””’]] [[User talk:Rosguill|”talk”]] 14:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

::omg im so sorry i didnt noticed that when i was mentioned in the discussion that I couldnt re-reply. im gonna avoid [[User:Sandro1041|Sandro1041]] ([[User talk:Sandro1041#top|talk]]) 14:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

:::Please also note Rosguill’s comment about [[WP:GAME|gaming the system]]. Creating several implausible test pages for redirects to Russia can be seen as disruptive. [[User:Significa liberdade|Significa liberdade (she/her)]] ([[User talk:Significa liberdade|talk]]) 15:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:®uss!a]]==

Hi Sandro1041! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may find the advice at WP:ECREXPLAIN helpful. Please note that comments such as Special:Diff/1316279564 violate the restriction, and that rapid-fire edits are likely to be seen as a form of WP:GAMING. Please slow down and learn your way around. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

omg im so sorry i didnt noticed that when i was mentioned in the discussion that I couldnt re-reply. im gonna avoid Sandro1041 (talk) 14:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note Rosguill’s comment about gaming the system. Creating several implausible test pages for redirects to Russia can be seen as disruptive. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on ®uss!a requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Yerlo (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, ®u$$!@, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

im scient now! im gonna pay more attention when testing Sandro1041 (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Russ!a requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

The page Ru$$!@ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply