User talk:Sawbrimedline: Difference between revisions

Hello, I’m Discospinster. An edit that you recently made to Mad Catz seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! discospinster talk 19:47, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think you make a mistake, thus, The Mad Catz edit was mine and nobody else’s. Sawbrimedline (talk) 19:50, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t know what that means, but you have been making grammatically incorrect edits to several articles. discospinster talk 20:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I heavily apologize for violating any article on Wikipedia. Sawbrimedline (talk) 20:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Mikeycdiamond. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, McDonald’s, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sawbrimedline! Your additions to Independent Truck Company have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 20:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check or knew the added copyrighted work i added on Independent Truck Company? Sawbrimedline (talk) 00:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Beyond Skate.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:38, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to your support, but how can i find non-copyrighted images? i unfortunately can not find any free sources on the internet. So please tell me. Sawbrimedline (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sawbrimedline

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beyond Skate for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn’t be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

jlwoodwa (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Twin Towers within 9-11.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2021-09-10/photos-images-of-the-9-11-attacks and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia’s copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. discospinster talk 15:24, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Twin Towers during 9-11.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57698668 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia’s copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. discospinster talk 15:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mad-Catz-R.A.T-8+-Mouse.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as “for non-commercial use only”, “no derivative use”, “for Wikipedia use only”, or “used with permission”; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Altenmann >talk 23:37, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

if you continue adding unreferenced informarion and adding images that constitute copyright violation you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Altenmann >talk 23:43, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at HyperX, you may be blocked from editing. 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:C43E:CF3E:CA0A:DD37 (talk) 00:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HyperX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboards. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sawbrimedline,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beyond Skate for deletion, because the article doesn’t clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn’t be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

–DMartin 03:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank god, I truly had a hard time editing Beyond Skate mainly for a project for me, by me, to me. Massive kudos to yourself for doing me a favor and removing the article, Mr. DMartin! Sawbrimedline (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here’s wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sawbrimedline! I see that you’ve already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:44, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings all Wikipedia users and admins, Today, I unfortunately got blocked and censored by an editor for violating the free use policy. Hopefully, There is one more chance that I might edit some articles and there’s everyone that can supportb me. P.S. I regret everything I did, and now, I can succumb to my actions. For the Wikipedians out there, I apologize for being controversial and a mistake for all and that I may can be forgiven due to my consequences. Sawbrimedline (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Dear JJMC89, for the absolute positivity of everything I edited, if I would, Please remove my user block if you can already.

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sawbrimedline (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Remove my expiration date for the violation of the Non-free use content policy

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:21, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please forgive for what I did. Thank you.

I am writing to you for the admin block you gave me from yesterday.

What I did was extremely unacceptable, inappropriate, disrespectful, and highly unapologetic for my reason to be here. For the suffering and pain I experienced, I just want to say that, I heavily apologize for the criticism I have taken. Even though I can accept your user privileges, I am guilty for the actions of my consequences. When you confronted me about misinformation, I was dead silent only for a day. If I was a admin, i would be independent and trustworthy to even do so.

It was never met to challenge your curiosity. rather, it was just a one time thing often described as “Censorship“. by the justice for disciplinary action.

For the dignity I have for my article posts, I honestly trust and respect your opinion and judgement.

– Sincerely Yours, Sawbrimedline (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin comment) Please actually write a reason for admins to unblock you, like what are you gonna do to not fall back into the habits of editing disruptively, and adding non-free content to edits, what articles are you gonna try to add free images or non-free images with actual copyright shane (talk to me if you want!) 03:46, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This response is hereby submitted for a decision in accordance with the Copyright Act of 1976 and Non-free content criteria policy.

This is unfortunate, clear and certain that Sawbrimedline‘s slick, bastardry, low-leveled occupation and the administrators are ignoring/refusing to acknowledge and take action the obvious; that the free, web-based, online encyclopedia Wikipedia is the-nineth most visited website, #1 most useful information-related encyclopedia, and is always an acceptation. Mr. Rolando has never answered and/or never heard of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research, according the U.S. rule of the Copyright Act of 1976. turns out, any arguments of any time, money and hypocritical finance otherwise, Yet, the young man himself is slowly killing his reputation for respect, positivity, and the gain of support of harassment, misinformation, and blatant falsehood.

In a desperate attempt to prove that the user is being “hung for his actions” given with bad faith, Mr. Rolando’s job as a editor to commercialize, sell, or auction his house goods for $7,500. This is a lie, as this is given the aftermath as a PDF presentation.

The licensing and personal trust that Jimmy Wales, the creator and co-founder of Wikipedia, is the “god” of all internet entrepreneurs and is a respectful businessman. The following complaint is without merit. It is a heavy-handed attempt (albeit and processing about limited public figure or celebrity) to suppress any artistic freedom and the well-published Fourth Amendment and Eighth Amendment of the United States of America. This right has been defended for those who are defended and is in good use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawbrimedline (talkcontribs) 00:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you clog the unblock queue with gibberish like this, you are probably going to get your talk page access revoked. Northern Moonlight 04:13, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The end…

Well, this is it. i’m just going to accept my fate, just quit the internet for life, plus i’ll commit suicide and see where it goes from there. No block requests, no extra words, nothing, absolutely nothing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version