User talk:Segura.security: Difference between revisions

Line 34: Line 34:

::My proposed new username is: cyberawareness [[User:Segura.security|Segura.security]] ([[User talk:Segura.security#top|talk]]) 19:31, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

:::{{nacmt}} Hi there. It looks like you may have used AI/an LLM to write this; please read [[WP:NICETRY]] to see why this is discouraged. You were blocked, not AI; we are interested in hearing from you. Knowing that, if you did use some sort of AI tool here, could you please rewrite your answers to the points in the block notice and the questions above in your own words? I think it would also be helpful if you explained more specifically what edits you would make or topics you would like to edit about, if unblocked. Best, [[User:GoldRomean|GoldRomean]] ([[User talk:GoldRomean|talk]]) 02:25, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

::::1. Disclosure of Compensation

::::I am an employee at Segura, but I would like to highlight that my article that I sent to the draft was informational with all external references without an advertisement, kindly check the draft and you will see that the article follow the wikipedia rules.

::::2. Understanding the Block and Commitment to Policy Compliance

::::I understant that by using a username identical to the subject of an article can violate the neutrality policies.

::::3. Intended Contributions if Unblocked

::::If I’m unblocked I can help to add or edit contents related to cybersecurity which I have know-how.

::::4. Proposed New Username

::::For the new username I propose the following one: cyberawareness [[User:Segura.security|Segura.security]] ([[User talk:Segura.security#top|talk]]) 14:30, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your proposed new username” with your new username and replace the text “Your reason here” with your reasons to be unblocked.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says “There is no global account for [username]”, the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your reason here” with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Segura.security (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

I understand the reason for the block, so I propose a new username. Kindly take it into consideration.

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=cyberawareness | 3=I understand the reason for the block, so I propose a new username. Kindly take it into consideration. | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=cyberawareness | reason=I understand the reason for the block, so I propose a new username. Kindly take it into consideration. | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after “decline=”, a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=cyberawareness | reason=I understand the reason for the block, so I propose a new username. Kindly take it into consideration. | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Segura.security (talk • contribs) 12:43, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review Wikipedia’s payment disclosure and conflict of interest policies and guidelines, then explain in your own words how those apply to your block and what you would do differently if unblocked.
Describe the types of edits you would like to make if you were unblocked.

Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. Disclosure of Compensation

I am an employee at Segura, but I would like to highlight that my edits were made in good faith, with the sole intention of sharing accurate and verifiable information with all external references without an advertisement approach (kindly check the draft that I submited). I understand and respect Wikipedia’s requirement for transparency regarding paid contributions, and I will continue to comply fully with all disclosure policies if my circumstances change in the future.

2. Understanding the Block and Commitment to Policy Compliance

I now fully understand that using a username identical to the subject of an article I was editing created a clear conflict of interest and violated Wikipedia’s username and neutrality policies. I recognize that such a username can be perceived as promotional and may compromise the perceived neutrality of my contributions. I sincerely apologize for this oversight and assure you that I will not repeat this behavior. I am committed to adhering strictly to Wikipedia’s guidelines, including maintaining a neutral username and avoiding any edits that could be seen as self-promotional or biased.

3. Intended Contributions if Unblocked

If unblocked, I intend to make contributions that are factual, well-sourced, and in line with Wikipedia’s neutral point of view. My focus will be on improving articles related to my area of knowledge, ensuring that all information is supported by reliable sources and presented without bias. My goal is to support the integrity and reliability of Wikipedia as a free encyclopedia.

4. Proposed New Username

My proposed new username is: cyberawareness Segura.security (talk) 19:31, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi there. It looks like you may have used AI/an LLM to write this; please read WP:NICETRY to see why this is discouraged. You were blocked, not AI; we are interested in hearing from you. Knowing that, if you did use some sort of AI tool here, could you please rewrite your answers to the points in the block notice and the questions above in your own words? I think it would also be helpful if you explained more specifically what edits you would make or topics you would like to edit about, if unblocked. Best, GoldRomean (talk) 02:25, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. Disclosure of Compensation

I am an employee at Segura, but I would like to highlight that my article that I sent to the draft was informational with all external references without an advertisement, kindly check the draft and you will see that the article follow the wikipedia rules.

2. Understanding the Block and Commitment to Policy Compliance

I understant that by using a username identical to the subject of an article can violate the neutrality policies.

3. Intended Contributions if Unblocked

If I’m unblocked I can help to add or edit contents related to cybersecurity which I have know-how.

4. Proposed New Username

For the new username I propose the following one: cyberawareness Segura.security (talk) 14:30, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment