User talk:Shatootesabz: Difference between revisions

@Drew Stanley: Hi Stanley,

Thank you very much for your comment and valuable suggestions on the draft. I have now implemented the necessary revisions and changes based on your feedback, and I hope the article is now improved.

I would kindly ask if you could please consider moving Draft:Houshmand Dehghan to the mainspace.Shatootesabz (talk) 08:36, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“I have requested the speedy deletion of the Houshmand Dehghan page. Please delete it. I hate Wiki.” Shatootesabz (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:03, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shatootesabz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:03, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Moves is not a substitute for submitting a draft through WP:AFC. Your WP:ANI complaint is baseless. If your draft is complete and ready as you claim, then it will be accepted at AFC easily. — Whpq (talk) 15:13, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was not worried about my article being accepted. I wanted (and, of course, no longer want) to see my published article with my own eyes sooner. Your colleagues extinguished this passion in me after months of effort. And by the way, how do I know they won’t reject it again after months of waiting, just as they quickly rejected it today without a reason (and I am sure, without even reading the draft)? I am even certain that you, too, have not once read this accurate, academic, and valuable article with a fair eye.

All of you are saying the same thing: that I am guilty. Well, come and collectively lynch me. Maybe later I will become more famous than my subject. My dear, all of you accuse me of using artificial intelligence. Is there anyone in today’s world who doesn’t use AI for help? But I’d bet a billion on the fact that if you ask artificial intelligence to write an article about AI a hundred times, it will never be as accurate and comprehensive as this article. Artificial intelligence is an excuse to reject valuable articles. Otherwise, AI’s mercy, emotion, humanity, and justice are far greater than your colleagues’.

I will not wait for this article to be accepted or rejected. I hate Wikipedia now. It is a pity for my subject to have his name appear in such a malicious, inhumane, and robotic environment. Please completely delete it. Farewell, my brother. Shatootesabz (talk) 17:01, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t your administrators truly feel ashamed for making such accusations: You also seem to be a single purpose account and/or undisclosed paid editor with a conflict of interest on Houshmand Dehghan. Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents Shatootesabz (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You said: ” If your draft is complete and ready as you claim, then it will be accepted at AFC easily.”

EASILY!

He said that: “though it will be declined if you don’t change anything” Please say him “I shouldn’t change anything; it is you who must increase your level of honor.” Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents Shatootesabz (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“I have requested the speedy deletion of the Houshmand Dehghan page. Please delete it. I hate Wiki.” Shatootesabz (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How wonderful that I have also been accused of disruption on Wikipedia. Perhaps you don’t know where the story started. Let me tell you briefly.

I began compiling content about Houshmand Dehghan (an imprisoned Baha’i, writer, historian, and banned from writing in his country) a few months ago. I registered on Wiki three days ago and placed the article draft in the queue. Today, I decided to ask one of the users for help to move it to the main space. I made the request respectfully. That’s it. In response, he said I must stay in the queue and not use artificial intelligence. I said I am requesting a transfer. He said, ‘The same thing I said.’ I said, ‘I have no debate with you.’ That’s all. Five minutes later, another user deleted my page for lack of notability. I reported this incident to the administrators and accused it of collusion. The administrators, in turn, baselessly accused me of receiving money from the subject.

Now, look at the Houshmand Dehghan page. If you are not afraid of jeopardizing your position on Wiki, examine it with fairness. Does such an article, with this level of academic referencing, not deserve publication? Fine, I am a thief. I am a swindler. But you be good and fair, and if you find that page worthy, publish it under your own name. Why do you needlessly harass new authors so much? All you ever say is ‘Artificial Intelligence.’ I swear to Christ, the emotions, fairness, and conduct of Artificial Intelligence are far more humane than your colleagues and administrators.

Thank you for reading this text. If you wish, block me right now. I do not value continued cooperation in this malicious and inhumane environment. Good luck. Shatootesabz (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your advise, I left a message for User:SafariScribe who declined my submission. But he didn’t reply (because he had nothing to say). What should I do now?

I wrote to him: “Regarding the draft ‘Houshmand Dehghan,’ please specify exactly which claim or which section of the article lacks sufficient or reliable sourcing. This article contains academic sources, such as Handal (2021) and Lambden (UC Merced), that have analyzed and cited his work.” Shatootesabz (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“I have requested the speedy deletion of the Houshmand Dehghan page. Please delete it. I hate Wiki.” Shatootesabz (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shatootesabz You’ve only been an editor for three days, have you considered the possibility that you simply misunderstood how Wikipedia works?

I’m not seeing any maliciousness or attempt to stifle you, what I can see is that you’ve not followed the rules for this encyclopedia.

Wikipedia is built in five core pillars, one of which is to assume good faith from others by default – you’re not doing that.

It’s ultimately your responsibility to learn how Wikipedia works – other volunteers will try to help, but they can’t learn it for you.

I wonder whether a lot of this might be down to a misunderstanding over language, so I’d like to let you know that there are lots of other Wikipedia projects that could really use your help, including one in your native language (if it’s not English). Blue Sonnet (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]