User talk:SouthernTHKnown: Difference between revisions

Hello SouthernTHKnown, I noticed you added a description of the Ham sleeve blouse to the article Traditional Thai clothing. It is important to also add references to text and paragraphs when possible. Verifiable and reliable sources add credibility and people can check it. So please do so in the future. –Artanisen (talk) 21:01, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology), you may be blocked from editing.

Hi @SouthernTHKnown, based on your editing history it seems you have been extensively using LLMs to update articles, in particular Traditional Thai clothing. These edits are often unsourced and display many signs of LLM-generated content. [1], [2], [3], [4], etc.. You were previously notified about that here, a message which you removed from your talk page with the edit summary saying I am capable in writing, it may seems like ai-generated but I am sure that it is my skills that I put in each editing. The style of writing in this edit summary is significantly different from that of most of your edits to articles, which makes it hard to believe you are not using LLMs for the latter. NicheSports (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was also noted by another editor at Talk:Traditional_Thai_clothing NicheSports (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SouthernTHKnown! I noticed that you recently made an edit at traditional Thai clothing and marked it as “minor”, but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, “minor edit” refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 15:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]