User talk:StevoLaker: Difference between revisions

Discuss it into talk page first. Benelux suits perfectly for the page from the moment it was added by another user. Island92 (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StevoLaker,

Thank you for creating Botswana–United Kingdom relations.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs expansion

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Eternal Shadow}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eternal Shadow Talk 02:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Foreign relations of the United Kingdom into Barbados–United Kingdom relations. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia’s content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia’s licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you’ve copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 05:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StevoLaker. Thank you for your work on Switzerland–United Kingdom Free Trade Agreement. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StevoLaker. Thank you for your work on Mexico–United Kingdom Free Trade Agreement. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Foreign relations of Nicaragua

added a link pointing to San Jose

Foreign relations of the United Kingdom

added a link pointing to San Jose

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ephraim Yeboah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page League Two.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:VANDNOT and WP:CIVILITY, and be careful not to wrongly accuse people of vandalism in the future as it may lead to them feeling unfairly attacked. — DeFacto (talk). 14:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Jose.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StevoLaker. Thank you for your work on South Korea–United Kingdom Free Trade Agreement. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Warm salutations! Thank you for creating the article! May you and your family have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I’ve noticed your edits at the table at Foreign relations of the United Kingdom and I think there’s a misunderstanding with the dates. In many cases, (especially with former British territories) the first British ambassador/high commissioner presented their credentials on the same day that the receiving country gained independence – for example the British ambassador to Timor-Leste on 20 May 2002 (day the country gained independence). This is when diplomatic relations begins and for me this is under Common sense is not original research. I hope we can sort this out and thank you for your sizeable work on the page. Semsûrî (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I previously believed this, however multiple examples of dates (such as with Afghanistan, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Israel, Thailand, etc) were incorrect when compared to a source that states the date of establishing diplomatic relations. The date of the presentation of the appointment of an ambassador or opening of an embassy are rarely the same as the date denoted to diplomatic relations. Therefore, the source must specify state when diplomatic relations were established. However thank you for fixing Cambodia, that was an error on my behalf. StevoLaker (talk) 18:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of South Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Diplomat.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Kingdom–European Union relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Standard.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SteveoLaker. I’ve noticed you are over categorizing treaty articles by adding subcats with parent cats. For instance on India–United Kingdom Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement you added Category:Premiership of Keir Starmer and Category:Keir Starmer. The most fitting category is Category:Premiership of Keir Starmer as it is more directly related to his tenure in office than his main category.

Also, for defaultsort, it is not necessary to have them for these articles. For instance the relevant category of Category:India–United Kingdom relations can and should have the sort Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I saw that you updated the article Free trade agreements of the European Union in the past. From now on it’s possible to update the map with a simple text editor like Notepad on Windows 11! It’s even possible to add, change or remove stripes without a (vector) graphics app that costs money.

The description on how to update the map is written on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EU_FTAs.svg. If you have questions about the procedure in the text editor, just ask here. WikiPate (talk) 16:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you, like me, are creating or editing pages about which countries a president or prime minister has visited, then in addition to British prime ministers, why not create and edit pages about other leaders of countries too? The Sergei (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, nice to finally speak to you! I’ve seen you edit a lot!

I have done a little but my main interest and knowledge is UK politics, trade, and foreign affairs so those are the ones I tend to edit as I know a lot of information (or to find it) that is not currently accessible on Wikipedia.

Also I’m British so that’s probably why I tend to focus on that. Was there any specific page you were looking at or wanted assistance with? StevoLaker (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit and create pages about UK relations with other countries, for example United Kingdom relations with Latvia, Luxembourg, Finland, Tuvalu (I don’t know much about this country, but there should be sources, but there weren’t any, so I didn’t create this page), and something else. And were there people who might be interested in other countries that haven’t been added yet, meaning pages where a president or prime minister has visited the country? And you can edit about Joint Expeditionary Force and could there be JEF leaders’ summits from 2014 to 2022? And you can help with this page List of international trips made by foreign secretaries of the United Kingdom. The Sergei (talk) 05:45, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have been creating and editing UK relations pages for a while now so I’m sure I’ll get around to those specific countries.

In relation to the JEF summits, yes I added the summit section and I agree that the whole page needs to be updated. There wasn’t any previous summits as they were created as a response to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Sure, I’ll take a look at the foreign secretaries visit page once I have completed the Blair international trips page. StevoLaker (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could there be any virtual JEF summits? Is it true that the first JEF summit took place in March 2022 in London? And something was mentioned that foreign leaders were invited virtually at the JEF summits, something needs to be added. I can assume that JEF was created in 2014 in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea The Sergei (talk) 12:27, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it appears you are correct that there was a virtual summit in February 2022 and a London one in March 2022.

Yes JEF was created in response to the invasion of Crimea, however I would highly recommend against editing page based on assumptions—particularly as you can quickly google search for an article or ask an AI model to find the information (though check its sources actually back up what it says). You can put just about any information on a Wikipedia page so long as it is anbout the topic and is referenced by a reliable source (almost any news or government source).

Feel free to ask me questions or assistance on pages relating to international relations, trade and politics if you want some help or guidance. StevoLaker (talk) 21:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In source was written that the first Summit of the JEF leaders was held virtually on 25 February 2022, but in this day was the 2022 virtual extraordinary NATO summit The Sergei (talk) 04:15, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StevoLaker. Thank you for your work on Pacific States–United Kingdom Economic Partnership Agreement. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed and beautiful weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:47, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Do not add links to See also section if articles are already mentioned in the text. Eurohunter (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. According to Panama–United Kingdom relations please do not add links to See also section if articles are already mentioned in the text. Eurohunter (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of international prime ministerial trips made by Tony Blair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Palau–United Kingdom relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability found. Fram (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:02, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts (but never when editing articles). There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StevoLaker,

Please sign all talk page or noticeboard comments like on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palau–United Kingdom relations. It’s not too late to go back and add your signature. THank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]