Hi there, thanks for trying to help out at this article. Unfortunately, putting a new version of the article in the middle of the exisiting one isn’t very helpful. Please can you you add information on a line by line basis, with the appropriate reference at the end of each sentence? I’ve copied what you added below:
Hi there, thanks for trying to help out at this article. Unfortunately, putting a new version of the article in the middle of the exisiting one isn’t very helpful. Please can you you add information on a line by line basis, with the appropriate reference at the end of each sentence? I’ve copied what you added below:
‘<nowiki/>”’Victoria Calzada Falcón'<nowiki/>”’ (born 2 July 1985 in [[Montevideo|Montevideo, Uruguay]]) is a Uruguayan [[biochemist]], [[professor]], and [[Research|researcher]] specializing in the field of [[Aptamer|aptamers]] and [[Molecule|molecular]] imaging. She obtained her degree in Biochemistry from the Faculty of Sciences at the University of the Republic ([[University of the Republic (Uruguay)|Udelar]]) in 2008 and completed her Ph.D. in Chemistry in 2015 at the same institution. ‘<nowiki/>”’Calzada'<nowiki/>”’ serves as an ‘<nowiki/>”’Assistant Professor'<nowiki/>”’ in the [[Nuclear pharmacy|Radiopharmacy]] Department of the Center for Nuclear Research (CIN) at Udelar and is a Grade 3 researcher within the Basic Sciences Development Program (PEDECIBA). Since 2012, she has been a member of Uruguay’s National System of Researchers (SNI), currently holding Level I status. Her research focuses on the development of aptamer-based biopharmaceuticals for [[cancer]] diagnosis and therapy. In 2020, Calzada was awarded the [[L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Awards|L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Prize (Young Talents edition)]] for her project titled “Development of aptamer-based biopharmaceuticals,” which aims to create targeted diagnostic and therapeutic tools for cancer treatment. ‘<nowiki/>”’Calzada”’‘ is also the coordinator of the Ibero-American Aptamer Network (REDIBA) and a member of the International Society on Aptamers (INSOAP).https://www.fcien.edu.uy/noticias/1374-victoria-calzada-es-la-ganadora-del-premio-l-oreal-unesco? https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-educacion-cultura/comunicacion/noticias/ganadora-premio-loreal-unesco-mujeresenlaciencia-2020
‘<nowiki/>”’Victoria Calzada Falcón'<nowiki/>”’ (born 2 July 1985 in [[Montevideo|Montevideo, Uruguay]]) is a Uruguayan [[biochemist]], [[professor]], and [[Research|researcher]] specializing in the field of [[Aptamer|aptamers]] and [[Molecule|molecular]] imaging. She obtained her degree in Biochemistry from the Faculty of Sciences at the University of the Republic ([[University of the Republic (Uruguay)|Udelar]]) in 2008 and completed her Ph.D. in Chemistry in 2015 at the same institution. ‘<nowiki/>”’Calzada'<nowiki/>”’ serves as an ‘<nowiki/>”’Assistant Professor'<nowiki/>”’ in the [[Nuclear pharmacy|Radiopharmacy]] Department of the Center for Nuclear Research (CIN) at Udelar and is a Grade 3 researcher within the Basic Sciences Development Program (PEDECIBA). Since 2012, she has been a member of Uruguay’s National System of Researchers (SNI), currently holding Level I status. Her research focuses on the development of aptamer-based biopharmaceuticals for [[cancer]] diagnosis and therapy. In 2020, Calzada was awarded the [[L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Awards|L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Prize (Young Talents edition)]] for her project titled “Development of aptamer-based biopharmaceuticals,” which aims to create targeted diagnostic and therapeutic tools for cancer treatment. ‘<nowiki/>”’Calzada”’ is also the coordinator of the Ibero-American Aptamer Network (REDIBA) and a member of the International Society on Aptamers (INSOAP).https://www.fcien.edu.uy/noticias/1374-victoria-calzada-es-la-ganadora-del-premio-l-oreal-unesco? https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-educacion-cultura/comunicacion/noticias/ganadora-premio-loreal-unesco-mujeresenlaciencia-2020
Much of it repreated what was earlier in the article, so please pick out what is there and add it in, without duplication. [[User:Lajmmoore|Lajmmoore]] ([[User talk:Lajmmoore|talk]]) 07:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Much of it repreated what was earlier in the article, so please pick out what is there and add it in, without duplication. [[User:Lajmmoore|Lajmmoore]] ([[User talk:Lajmmoore|talk]]) 07:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note! I’ll either cite a reliable source or adjust the contribution to follow the guidelines. Appreciate the feedback. Juaniferrero (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi there – Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn’t provide a source for your changes to the Tahar Chaïbi article, and I couldn’t find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 18:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello friend, okey we can based in this source if you are agree: http://www.pesmitidelcalcio.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14436
- Tell me what you think about please. Juaniferrero (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- No, that’s not a reliable source either. GiantSnowman 19:00, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Greetings Juaniferrero. Your contributions on Ikorodo are supposed to be in Ikorodu instead. The latter is the town while the former, which is the page you edited, is a music genre. Please correct this mistake. Kwesi Yema (talk) 22:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done! Juaniferrero (talk) 15:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Sam, a pleasure talking with you. I’ve had some trouble with this, so I never use Wikipedia sources because of it. I always rely on external resources. Superjuani25 (talk) 19:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- That’s great, however the point is that some external sources copy material from Wikipedia. For example your addition here used ‘kiddle.co’, which notes that “Kiddle encyclopedia articles are based on selected content and facts from Wikipedia” at the bottom of the page, and your addition here sources dbpedia.org, which notes “This content was extracted from Wikipedia” at the bottom of the page. When you’re evaluating the sources you’re adding, you’ll need to watch for things like that. Sam Kuru (talk) 20:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Again, here. Please do not use very clearly identified mirrors as sources. Sam Kuru (talk) 22:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Again,here and here you have added ‘dbpedia’, which very clearly notes “This content was extracted from Wikipedia“. I’m also concerned that the material you’re adding is often a mini duplicative article that looks like it was generated by a an LLM (like ChatGPT). Please consider this a final warning – I’m not sure what it is that is causing you to add so many bad sources, but this is taking up the time of other volunteers to correct these mistakes. It would be best to respond here and outline how you’re evaluating your sources, and how you’re writing these additions. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Sam, I really want to apologize for adding that source again. What I’ve been doing is finding a topic I’m interested in, either through “Random article” or the main page, and then I look for references. Based on that, I start writing, and once I review it, I publish it. If that’s not the right way to do it, I’d appreciate it if you could let me know the best way. But I truly want to apologize, I must have overlooked the dbpedia source, and I regret that. Thank you very much for pointing it out, as I’ll now pay more attention to the sources than to what I’m trying to write. Have a great day! Superjuani25 (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- I was more interested in the process you’re using to select and evaluate sources. Are you searching on an exact quote? How are you reviewing the source to ensure it meets our guidelines on reliable sources? It seems hard to miss the credit to Wikipedia on some of those, so it feels like you’re just looking for something roughly applicable and using it immediately. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- So immediately after you responded above, you again added a mirror using the same pattern of simply rewording the prior parts of the article. “boldsystems” is a mirror/scraper – they simply pull in material from Wikipedia into an organized format, similar to “dbpedia”. The material very, very clearly notes “Taxon Description (Wikipedia)” and then provides a link to the source Wikipedia article: “full article at Wikipedia”. You then added a link to the mirror with some text that appears to be a loose re-wording of the existing material. Are you just taking that material and asking ChatGPT to shuffle it? I think it would be a really, really good idea for you to stop making additions until we’ve finished this discussion. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- What is it, sir? You told me I couldn’t use sources like DBpedia or anything related to those pages. After you told me that, I started being more careful with the sources I use, and yet you found another error… I’ll go watch some YouTube videos or read forums where they explain the correct way to add sources. I already have 120 edits, sir, and only 3 of them have had errors found. All I ever wanted was to contribute and help the community so that when someone wants to look something up, like I do, they can find more information. Once again, I apologize if that’s not the right way to do things, and I’ll make sure to learn more so I can keep doing what I’ve been doing these past few months… Thank you for your patience and for teaching me a little more every day. Superjuani25 (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- I’m happy to help, but you’ll need to answer the questions I posed to you so that I can diagnose the misunderstanding that is leading you to add false sources and odd commentary. 1) Are you searching on an exact quote? 2) How are you reviewing the source to ensure it meets our guidelines on reliable sources? 3) Are you just taking that material and asking ChatGPT to shuffle it? Sam Kuru (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Sam,
- Well, the process I follow is: 1) I find a topic to write about and gather information. 2) I search on Google for more details and information. 3) I prepare the text and post it.
- That’s exactly the process I follow. I’ve never created content using ChatGPT. I think that could be penalized, and it’s unnecessary for people to find the same information on Wikipedia and ChatGPT. But I’m not sure if that’s correct, maybe you can share some recommendations. Superjuani25 (talk) 22:57, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- I’m happy to help, but you’ll need to answer the questions I posed to you so that I can diagnose the misunderstanding that is leading you to add false sources and odd commentary. 1) Are you searching on an exact quote? 2) How are you reviewing the source to ensure it meets our guidelines on reliable sources? 3) Are you just taking that material and asking ChatGPT to shuffle it? Sam Kuru (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- What is it, sir? You told me I couldn’t use sources like DBpedia or anything related to those pages. After you told me that, I started being more careful with the sources I use, and yet you found another error… I’ll go watch some YouTube videos or read forums where they explain the correct way to add sources. I already have 120 edits, sir, and only 3 of them have had errors found. All I ever wanted was to contribute and help the community so that when someone wants to look something up, like I do, they can find more information. Once again, I apologize if that’s not the right way to do things, and I’ll make sure to learn more so I can keep doing what I’ve been doing these past few months… Thank you for your patience and for teaching me a little more every day. Superjuani25 (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Sam, I really want to apologize for adding that source again. What I’ve been doing is finding a topic I’m interested in, either through “Random article” or the main page, and then I look for references. Based on that, I start writing, and once I review it, I publish it. If that’s not the right way to do it, I’d appreciate it if you could let me know the best way. But I truly want to apologize, I must have overlooked the dbpedia source, and I regret that. Thank you very much for pointing it out, as I’ll now pay more attention to the sources than to what I’m trying to write. Have a great day! Superjuani25 (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Again,here and here you have added ‘dbpedia’, which very clearly notes “This content was extracted from Wikipedia“. I’m also concerned that the material you’re adding is often a mini duplicative article that looks like it was generated by a an LLM (like ChatGPT). Please consider this a final warning – I’m not sure what it is that is causing you to add so many bad sources, but this is taking up the time of other volunteers to correct these mistakes. It would be best to respond here and outline how you’re evaluating your sources, and how you’re writing these additions. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Again, here. Please do not use very clearly identified mirrors as sources. Sam Kuru (talk) 22:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- That’s great, however the point is that some external sources copy material from Wikipedia. For example your addition here used ‘kiddle.co’, which notes that “Kiddle encyclopedia articles are based on selected content and facts from Wikipedia” at the bottom of the page, and your addition here sources dbpedia.org, which notes “This content was extracted from Wikipedia” at the bottom of the page. When you’re evaluating the sources you’re adding, you’ll need to watch for things like that. Sam Kuru (talk) 20:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for trying to help out at this article. Unfortunately, putting a new version of the article in the middle of the exisiting one isn’t very helpful. Please can you you add information on a line by line basis, with the appropriate reference at the end of each sentence? I’ve copied what you added below:
‘Victoria Calzada Falcón’ (born 2 July 1985 in Montevideo, Uruguay) is a Uruguayan biochemist, professor, and researcher specializing in the field of aptamers and molecular imaging. She obtained her degree in Biochemistry from the Faculty of Sciences at the University of the Republic (Udelar) in 2008 and completed her Ph.D. in Chemistry in 2015 at the same institution. ‘Calzada’ serves as an ‘Assistant Professor’ in the Radiopharmacy Department of the Center for Nuclear Research (CIN) at Udelar and is a Grade 3 researcher within the Basic Sciences Development Program (PEDECIBA). Since 2012, she has been a member of Uruguay’s National System of Researchers (SNI), currently holding Level I status. Her research focuses on the development of aptamer-based biopharmaceuticals for cancer diagnosis and therapy. In 2020, Calzada was awarded the L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Prize (Young Talents edition) for her project titled “Development of aptamer-based biopharmaceuticals,” which aims to create targeted diagnostic and therapeutic tools for cancer treatment. ‘Calzada‘ is also the coordinator of the Ibero-American Aptamer Network (REDIBA) and a member of the International Society on Aptamers (INSOAP).https://www.fcien.edu.uy/noticias/1374-victoria-calzada-es-la-ganadora-del-premio-l-oreal-unesco? https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-educacion-cultura/comunicacion/noticias/ganadora-premio-loreal-unesco-mujeresenlaciencia-2020
Much of it repreated what was earlier in the article, so please pick out what is there and add it in, without duplication. Lajmmoore (talk) 07:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Lajmmoore, could you please check if everything is okay now? Thank you for the advertisement. Superjuani25 (talk) 23:19, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, Superjuani25, the changes you made weren’t very helpful I’m afraid. Lots of the same reference was duplicated and it also duplicated information that was already there (which I had asked you not to do above). Articles that are short don’t need to have so many headings. Also the references you did add were just bare URLs, please use the citation button and the autmoic referencing function. I’ve streamlined it and retained the information that was not duplication. It’s great to have new contributors but please do read WP:CS and also read the articles and check if the information you’re adding is in fact needed. WP:MOS and WP:LAYOUT would be useful guidance for you to read and follow. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.
It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Good morning Dianna, thank you very much for the explanation. I will take it into account for the next times I publish. Have a nice day! Superjuani25 (talk) 13:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi — are you using AI to generate content for articles? You’ve mentioned that you don’t use ChatGPT, but other tools for checking grammar and the like also include similar AI functions. I bring this up because your edits display some signs of AI use, including the above comments, as well as formatting typical of AI tools and inappropriate tone. For example, this edit contains phrases like This pivotal role underscores his commitment to national sovereignty and democratic values.
and Saja’s literary work often explores themes of human dignity, morality, and social justice, reflecting the complex historical and cultural contexts of Lithuania during the Soviet era and its subsequent independence.
, which are very typical of AI writing in addition to violating our neutral point of view policy.
If so, it is strongly recommended that you disclose whatever tools you are using to make it easier for editors to review: “Every edit that incorporates LLM output should be marked as LLM-assisted by identifying the name and, if possible, version of the AI in the edit summary.” Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, dear Gnomingstuff.
- As I mentioned before, I do not use ChatGPT to make edits, as I don’t consider it necessary. When I spoke with another administrator, he told me that it is prohibited to use AI, even for checking grammatical errors. I understand this is still the case, or can I use some type of grammar checker to avoid grammatical mistakes? Superjuani25 (talk) 19:52, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
