User talk:SynergenX: Difference between revisions

Line 18: Line 18:

:What are they doing that allows them to have a page, but you are blocking mine? [[User:SynergenX|SynergenX]] ([[User talk:SynergenX#top|talk]]) 17:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

:and by the way, I am not trying to be argumentative, but in fairness, if a very similar business is allowed to have a page, I think by all means we should be able to have one as well. If there is anything I can do in order to fall into the correct guidelines and be published properly, I would certainly appreciate your guidance. Happy to edit appropriately. Thank you in advance. [[User:SynergenX|SynergenX]] ([[User talk:SynergenX#top|talk]]) 17:41, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

::Wikipedia is not a business directory; I think you’ll find many any of questions answered at [[Wikipedia:Yes, it is promotion]], which Yamla has already directed you to.– [[User:Ponyo|”’Ponyo”']][[User talk:Ponyo|”bons mots”]] 17:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:SynergenX Testosterone and Weight Loss|SynergenX Testosterone and Weight Loss]] (October 22) ==

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your proposed new username” with your new username and replace the text “Your reason here” with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you’d like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your reason here” with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can provide sources for this content. It says if sources are from relevant media then it’s allowed? By the way, how are you blocking my page, but WP is allowing the exact same type of business to have a WP page; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hims_%26_Hers_Health

What are they doing that allows them to have a page, but you are blocking mine? SynergenX (talk) 17:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and by the way, I am not trying to be argumentative, but in fairness, if a very similar business is allowed to have a page, I think by all means we should be able to have one as well. If there is anything I can do in order to fall into the correct guidelines and be published properly, I would certainly appreciate your guidance. Happy to edit appropriately. Thank you in advance. SynergenX (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a business directory; I think you’ll find many any of questions answered at Wikipedia:Yes, it is promotion, which Yamla has already directed you to.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikishovel were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Wikishovel (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SynergenX!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply