User talk:Taking Out The Trash: Difference between revisions

I want to stay private. I don’t wanna reveal TOO much information about myself. I am very young and still in school. SharkPuppet3 (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I didn’t delete your user page. I simply blanked (removed all content from it) because generally, you shouldn’t be putting ASCII Art or anything that resembles it on any page on Wikipedia. Even your user page is not an unlimited sandbox to write whatever you want. The second message on your talk page explains in more detail and provides direct links to guidelines on what you can and cannot put on your user page. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to stay private! Don’t you know that Wikipedia knows all of our addresses? What if they get leaked? SharkPuppet3 (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know where you got that information from, but it’s not true. While Wikipedia does store your IP address, that’s very different from your actual home address. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wonder if you might instead hat content you reverted with this edit at Talk:Rouzbeh Yassini by an IP editor, with a note that it is apparently LLM-generated. My reasoning is along the lines of maintaining visibility into the ongoing efforts of SPAs and IPs attempting influence or directly insert inappropriate content to the article–activity that has raised COI and socking concerns. Thanks. Xan747 (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right on queue you have been reverted by the current SPA/COI editor. Xan747 (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just a friendly heads-up that you’re nearing the WP:3RR at Everybody’s Golf Hot Shots. I know it’s easy to miss that when doing WP:RCP — hopefully if I’m ever in the same boat you’ll return the favor of a kind reminder 🙂 —tony 21:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained deletion of content is vandalism, and therefore not edit warring. You can’t just call a section “irrelevant” and delete it in its entirety. But I won’t keep warring with them – they’re going so fast I’ll just report them. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that on the Breakneck talk page, you reverted a talk page contribution made by Dsheridanb on the grounds that the contribution appeared to be AI-generated. Dsheridanb and I had been going back-and-forth about a content question related to Breakneck and I thought it was a constructive conversation. I guess it’s possible that Dsheridanb uses AI to help formulate their thoughts, but I do think that the thoughts were real and constructive thoughts and points. I would like to get their comment back on the talk page so I can continue the conversation but I would hesitate to revert your revert. Novellasyes (talk) 13:19, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Generally my MO is to revert anything that’s blatantly AI-generated material, which that post was. However, I have no objection if you wish to reinstate it, as long as you acknowledge that you are reinstating potentially problematic material and that it may or may not in fact be “real, constructive, thoughts and points”. Taking Trash Out (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]