User talk:TechReader92: Difference between revisions

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

== November 2025 ==

[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, TechReader92, [[Help:Getting started|welcome to Wikipedia]] and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/TechReader92|your contributions]]. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as {{User|Fintechwriter2018}}. Our [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|policy on multiple accounts]] usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please [[WP:SHARE|disclose]] these connections. Thank you.<!– Template:uw-agf-sock –> ”[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]” <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 16:26, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your proposed new username” with your new username and replace the text “Your reason here” with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you’d like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your reason here” with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user’s request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TechReader92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for promotional editing on behalf of AccountsIQ and for using a company-like username. I disclose that I was editing with a conflict of interest as an employee/representative of AccountsIQ. I will follow Wikipedia’s paid-contribution disclosure rules and will no longer make promotional edits. In the future, I will suggest changes on article Talk pages and contribute neutrally to other topics of interest. I would also like to change my username to TechReader92.

Accept reason:

With consent of the blocking admin, I have lifted this block. You must disclose your conflict of interest as per WP:COI before editing further. We will also hold you to your promise to refrain from writing directly about AccountsIQ. Yamla (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish: Given this user’s promise to refrain from writing directly about AccountsIQ (so, they won’t be creating drafts or anything like their deleted User:AccountsIQ25/sandbox), and given they promise to disclose their COI, any objection to an unblock? —Yamla (talk) 12:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me, no objection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, AccountsIQ, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

bonadea contributions talk 16:26, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TechReader92! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:26, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TechReader92, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Fintechwriter2018 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:26, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]