User talk:Thatairplaneguy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 11: Line 11:

:Oh okay, yeah I see what you mean. I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperoenoch and all I know about them is that they work in the same administration that I do. But if you look back to my contributes you will be able to see that I have been on Wikipedia for about a year before they joined and vandalized that article. I do hope that this does clear up some confusion with everything that is happening and I do also hope that I can get back to writing on this great website soon! [[User:Thatairplaneguy|Thatairplaneguy]] ([[User talk:Thatairplaneguy#top|talk]]) 01:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

:Oh okay, yeah I see what you mean. I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperoenoch and all I know about them is that they work in the same administration that I do. But if you look back to my contributes you will be able to see that I have been on Wikipedia for about a year before they joined and vandalized that article. I do hope that this does clear up some confusion with everything that is happening and I do also hope that I can get back to writing on this great website soon! [[User:Thatairplaneguy|Thatairplaneguy]] ([[User talk:Thatairplaneguy#top|talk]]) 01:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock|Your reason here Once again as I stated I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperonoch and I think that I am being affected by collateral damage because of their actions. As we both are in the same organisation so I guess we share the same ISP? I think that it is unfair that I have to suffer the consequences of THEIR actions and I don’t see why I have to even be involved in all of this if I did nothing wrong

== Unblock request ==

<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Unblock|unblock]]|Your reason here Once again as I stated I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperonoch and I think that I am being affected by collateral damage because of their actions. As we both are in the same organisation so I guess we share the same ISP? I think that it is unfair that I have to suffer the consequences of THEIR actions and I don’t see why I have to even be involved in all of this if I did nothing wrong”<nowiki>}} </nowiki> [[User:Thatairplaneguy|Thatairplaneguy]] ([[User talk:Thatairplaneguy#top|talk]]) 14:27, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:30, 22 November 2025

Thatairplaneguy (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Thatairplaneguy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Sellosealsaviation is my best friend and as friends I linked his userpage to mine! Now I think that it is unjust (Both blocks fyi for his account and mine!) since we both just like aviation and want to make sure people are in the know about it. But please just rethink this we really like wiki and would like to continue to work on it (We did nothing wrong!)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here Sellosealsaviation is my best friend and as friends I linked his userpage to mine! Now I think that it is unjust (Both blocks fyi for his account and mine!) since we both just like aviation and want to make sure people are in the know about it. But please just rethink this we really like wiki and would like to continue to work on it (We did nothing wrong!) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here Sellosealsaviation is my best friend and as friends I linked his userpage to mine! Now I think that it is unjust (Both blocks fyi for his account and mine!) since we both just like aviation and want to make sure people are in the know about it. But please just rethink this we really like wiki and would like to continue to work on it (We did nothing wrong!) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here Sellosealsaviation is my best friend and as friends I linked his userpage to mine! Now I think that it is unjust (Both blocks fyi for his account and mine!) since we both just like aviation and want to make sure people are in the know about it. But please just rethink this we really like wiki and would like to continue to work on it (We did nothing wrong!) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
You have not explained your connection to Julianamuperoenoch. Additionally, I do not find this report credible for other, non-technical reasons. Reviewing admins are welcome to ask if they don’t spot it themselves. — asilvering (talk) 00:22, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay, yeah I see what you mean. I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperoenoch and all I know about them is that they work in the same administration that I do. But if you look back to my contributes you will be able to see that I have been on Wikipedia for about a year before they joined and vandalized that article. I do hope that this does clear up some confusion with everything that is happening and I do also hope that I can get back to writing on this great website soon! Thatairplaneguy (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Thatairplaneguy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Once again as I stated I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperonoch and I think that I am being affected by collateral damage because of their actions. As we both are in the same organisation so I guess we share the same ISP? I think that it is unfair that I have to suffer the consequences of THEIR actions and I don’t see why I have to even be involved in all of this if I did nothing wrong. I would also like to clear up that I originally thought that this was because of my account being mentioned on @Sellosealsaviation28 so my bad for any confusion in my first request.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here Once again as I stated I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperonoch and I think that I am being affected by collateral damage because of their actions. As we both are in the same organisation so I guess we share the same ISP? I think that it is unfair that I have to suffer the consequences of THEIR actions and I don't see why I have to even be involved in all of this if I did nothing wrong. I would also like to clear up that I originally thought that this was because of my account being mentioned on @Sellosealsaviation28 so my bad for any confusion in my first request. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here Once again as I stated I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperonoch and I think that I am being affected by collateral damage because of their actions. As we both are in the same organisation so I guess we share the same ISP? I think that it is unfair that I have to suffer the consequences of THEIR actions and I don't see why I have to even be involved in all of this if I did nothing wrong. I would also like to clear up that I originally thought that this was because of my account being mentioned on @Sellosealsaviation28 so my bad for any confusion in my first request. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here Once again as I stated I do not have a personal connection to @Julianamuperonoch and I think that I am being affected by collateral damage because of their actions. As we both are in the same organisation so I guess we share the same ISP? I think that it is unfair that I have to suffer the consequences of THEIR actions and I don't see why I have to even be involved in all of this if I did nothing wrong. I would also like to clear up that I originally thought that this was because of my account being mentioned on @Sellosealsaviation28 so my bad for any confusion in my first request. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version