User talk:Thebricknerd: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


Line 30: Line 30:

:on what [[User:Thebricknerd|Thebricknerd]] ([[User talk:Thebricknerd#top|talk]]) 20:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

:on what [[User:Thebricknerd|Thebricknerd]] ([[User talk:Thebricknerd#top|talk]]) 20:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

::Here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Julie_Leask&diff=prev&oldid=1317173128], linking WHO (World Health Organization) to rock band the Who; and here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_power_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1317175030], where you added disimprovements like changing “a total of” to “a grand total of”, and “contributing around 3% of” to “contributing to around 3% of”, and other unnecessary spelling changes; and here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morgan_Wallen&diff=prev&oldid=1317176290], adding “shattering the impressive record” and unsourced bullshit like “a stop in Las Vegas where Amanda (#1 fan) watched him”.

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] Stop it. <small><sub>”signed”, </sub></small>[[User:Willondon|Willondon]] ([[User Talk:Willondon|talk]]) 21:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)


Revision as of 21:20, 16 October 2025

Hello, I’m LuniZunie. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Romanticism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LuniZunie 18:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Romanticism. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can’t find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Romanticism was changed by Thebricknerd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862614 on 2025-10-10T18:49:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thebricknerd!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anerdw (talk) 15:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. signed, Willondon (talk) 20:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

on what Thebricknerd (talk) 20:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here [1], linking WHO (World Health Organization) to rock band the Who; and here [2], where you added disimprovements like changing “a total of” to “a grand total of”, and “contributing around 3% of” to “contributing to around 3% of”, and other unnecessary spelling changes; and here [3], adding “shattering the impressive record” and unsourced bullshit like “a stop in Las Vegas where Amanda (#1 fan) watched him”.

Stop it. signed, Willondon (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version