User talk:TheLivingDanish1: Difference between revisions

Here’s wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TheLivingDanish1! I see that you’ve already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! C F A 15:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Perhaps it would be better to simply add a mention of this to a fitting place in the Box jellyfish article?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

LittlePuppers (talk) 06:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLivingDanish1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LittlePuppers (talk) 06:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLivingDanish1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Lund Madsen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLivingDanish1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, “Peter Lund Madsen“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLivingDanish1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gastric phacellae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLivingDanish1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, “Gastric phacellae“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rana uenoi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rana neba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 13:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Culai brown frog, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 14:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ericabatrachidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anura. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These have a meaning – as described by the ICZN 51.3.

TL;DR – an author and year in brackets indicate that the species was originally named in a genus other than that which it now shows.

Please do not remove them for the sake of “consistency” in list articles.

Thanks
Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not add them when they are not present. – UtherSRG (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLivingDanish1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rana strausi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Paravima totoro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 26 § Paravima totoro until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I didn’t intend to notify you. My apologies. Notification was intended for NotAGenious who moved the page to ‘Paravima totoro. Plantdrew (talk) 23:09, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheLivingDanish1, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  An article that you have been involved in editing—Athenidelphax kennedyae—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]