User talk:Thequillworks: Difference between revisions

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thequillworks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have no idea what happened and how it happened – but this is a mess. I created this account on November 6 with intent to edit on the platform, and widen my skills, i am more then happy to verify my email and get it clear to the wiki admins that i am not connected to some AryaanKhan056 – this is weird – I went through the sockpuppet investigations and read this – This shortlist (not a typo) includes a bunch of people who are already blocked for UPE, a UPEfarm I already ran into, a UPEfarm Izno already ran into, and a bunch of assorted characters whose names are almost certainly not “Joe” or “Hamish”. They don’t connect unambiguously enough to Ayesha/Sophia/Lily that I’ll call any of these a likely “master” of those accounts, but I think we can be pretty certain that at least some of them are our girl. Some of the others might have just been in the wrong place at the wrong time, but since they’re all doing obvious UPE or effectively confirmed to someone doing obvious UPE my sympathies are limited. There is so much junk on this range that I spotted someone ranting about “godi media” and thought “oh finally, a normal person.” I am tired, and I am blocking everyone. — asilvering (talk) 04:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC) To @asilvering – I am unsure what made you believe I am connected to whatever the investigation’s are on the table right now – but you got me wrong. I have not done a single edit yet since I am a student and I barely have time on my plate, and when I sat down today to start sharpening up my skills, directly on the main space rather then sandbox – I got blocked? Kindly have this checked out – since Wikipedia is a community for all and I feel harassed being blocked – i don’t mean to be rude, and I respect all your investigations – but you got the wrong person mate. My email is linked to my account – you are more then welcome to get it verified to see my real identity – but i request to be unblocked so I can do what I came here for – learn how to edit, and make a small but impactful change on Wikipedia with my grammar skills

Decline reason:

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thequillworks (talk • contribs) 21:56, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @Asilvering: pinging as blocking admin. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:41, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thequillworks, you came to make some “small but impactful change” – that sounds great! Unfortunately it looks like you created drafts on two American businessmen who have paid you to create Wikipedia articles about them. I’d really prefer that your small and impactful changes followed our terms of service. — asilvering (talk) 04:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering

Firstly – the drafts I created on my PERSONAL SANDBOX were for my learning purposes – we are living in 2025 and although AI is against the WIKi guidelines, I have a friend who was teaching me how ai can write the whole code, and how it can instantly turn a code in a page, and the two “businessMen” You’re referring to – are random folks I came across while searching authors – so we could see what ai can do, and YES I AM AWARE THAT AI IS AGAINST WIKI GUIDELINES AND I DO NOT INTEND TO USE IT ON ARTICLES IT WAS FOR MY KNOWLEDGE.

I request that my account shall be unblocked, and in the mere future, if you see me creating any pages – You are more then welcome to block me and I won’t raise a word.

I also want to note that WP:AGF and WP:ROPE encourage giving new editors the benefit of the doubt and allowing them room to learn. My sandbox work caused no disruption to the encyclopedia, and per WP:BLOCK, blocks should be preventative, not punitive. I believe this situation was a misunderstanding of intent rather than any attempt to violate guidelines – so I request to be unblocked and be under supervision – if I disrupt any Wiki Policies – I shall be banned from Wikipedia.

My only goal is to learn properly and make constructive contributions.

Thank you for your time and understanding Thequillworks (talk) 13:07, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve received your email. Please don’t email about your block. You currently have an unblock request open and an admin will review the block eventually. — asilvering (talk) 07:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Thequillworks, just to ask explicitly, are you saying you have no prior relationship with the subject of your edits? Please bear in mind that your sandbox is also part of Wikipedia, so if you want to see what AI can do we’d kindly ask that you do that on your own PC or another website.

If you’re unblocked, what topics would you want to edit? Blue Sonnet (talk) 15:13, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no prior relationship with the subjects. I now understand that I shouldn’t have used my sandbox as a learning tool and I regret my actions. I made this account to learn Wikipedia editing and contribute positive edits to the platform while abiding all community guidelines. I have no idea who User:AryaanKhan056 even is and honestly didn’t even know what a sock puppet was until I looked up the term. Please give me a chance to prove how I’m here for positivity and make impactful contributions and you won’t have any reasons of unblocking me again. This was all coincidental and the sandbox practices were errors on my part which I deeply regret. Thequillworks (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

blocking** Thequillworks (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thequillworks, in light of statements like [1], this really rings hollow. — asilvering (talk) 21:30, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I advise declining. This user is clearly ChronoTexts (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) who I will be blocking shortly. Izno (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]