Wait until the final report comes out. The document that is accessible is just about requests and not finals. Songda Talas 22:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Please read the report carefully before editing the page if the system was decommissioned, thank you. HurricaneEdgar 03:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
The edit summary field looks like this:
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Thanks! HurricaneEdgar 10:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
I noticed that you have been typing the input for the damages parameter like this:
| damages = $2.12 billion (2011 [[USD]])
Instead, I would appreciate if you wrote them like this:
| year = 2011
...
| damages = 2120000000
The year template exists for that reason, so I’d like you to use them as intended. Thanks! TheBigBookOfNaturalScience 📖 (💬/📜) 11:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you removed the infobox of current information of Subtropical storm Don in the 2023 Atlantic hurricane season. Please note that the infobox is extremely important for information and images and deleting it is not appreciated. Your edit has been reverted. Insendieum (talk) 23:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 01:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (“) and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on “text”. See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source’s words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Please be sure to check which user added the content. It was an IP Adress User that added the content, without giving a description nor a source. Also, the Typhoon Committee 56th session website is still under member access only, so please check the most recent session website to see if there is anything to support what a user added. Also, where the IP Adress edited Conson, I believe that Luc-binh is actually a name suggested by Hong Kong in a session some years ago, and not a Vietnamese name. The pages where I reverted your edits were Tropical Storm Conson (2021), Typhoon Hinnamnor, and the 2022 Pacific typhoon season. Songda Talas 00:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I understand Therealangelo1177 (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Forget about the Luc-binh part Songda Talas 17:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe Colombia 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazonas Department. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I see you were asked above, some time ago, to add edit summaries every time you save a change. But you don’t do it for the majority of your edits. Please review the directions and cooperate with the norms of the community in this regard. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Grand International 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampong Chhnang.
(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Please read MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE. Sub-national flags are rarely appropriate in Wikipedia articles, probably never in a pageant article like you added here. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- You didn’t reply here but I got notified by the software that you reverted me in several places and added flags back in again. I’m adding it to the ANI case (WP:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents § Therealangelo1177 disruption, reverting/restoring bad content in beauty pageant articles). You should be aware that both failure to communicate, and editing in contravention of community standards (one of which is MOS) are considered disruptive and can result in a block. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Even though you consider those countries (ex. Curacao, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, etc.) a territory of another country, the flags should also be there to represent their respective countries. You can see that in the past editions of beauty pageants, there are a lot of pageant articles that put a flag despite not being recognized in the list of all the countries. Removing the country flag there in the table would not be the same as per MOS:SOVEREIGNFLAG. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
I just wanted to ask if you could please cite and archive the sources that you use to update the season articles. Oftentimes, many of your contributions don’t include a supporting source or aren’t archived via Internet Archive or archive.ph. It would be more convenient for other editors as they’ll have to try to find the source before it gets overridden by new info. OhHaiMark (talk) 03:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
When you revert another editor with an edit summary like (summarizing you here) “this was important to include”, you are responsible for making sure the material has proper sources, just as if you had written it yourself. Could you keep that in mind and consider adding a source where I provided a link? Otherwise it is still failing WP:V and can be removed again. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Unsourced section in the article doesn’t mean that you should remove some information right away. Viewers might not know who made it to the semifinalists, finalists, and the winner of the pageant if you remove that table. The editors worked so hard to create a table for the contestants who made it to the first cut. By adding this (Template:Unreferenced section), should be enough to put that in a section where is unreferenced. Just in case, unless someone can put a reliable source to support it.
- Also, relating to a source that only supports the runners-up and the titleholder of the pageant edition doesn’t mean you should remove the semi-finalists. It took me a while to find a source that can be reliable, verifiable, and related to the unreferenced section. In this way, that section will not be removed. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- You are incorrect. Any editor may remove unsourced claims right away, this is exactly what WP:BURDEN says.
Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source.
Particularly when they involve living persons. - Lately as a courtesy I have been tagging unsourced sections of pageants and waiting a couple of weeks to a month before removing material. But this is not required. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I understand, but there are some times seeing a message in the top center that reverting someone’s change to add something or add a reliable source cannot be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits like what it said there. Doing it manually may take a while or may not know who made it to the first cut. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- It seems like you are saying you are deliberately reintroducing the unreferenced material because it will be difficult to restore deleted tables, later. That’s not a good reason. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Removing some information there that is unreferenced may find it not productive or helpful. It is not right to do that. Try finding a reliable source of yourself that can have an inline citation to a reliable source instead of just removing information. In this way, this will support it to the part where is unreferenced.
- I am doing it so hard just to have a reliable source to each of the unreferenced sections. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 03:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- It seems like you are saying you are deliberately reintroducing the unreferenced material because it will be difficult to restore deleted tables, later. That’s not a good reason. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I understand, but there are some times seeing a message in the top center that reverting someone’s change to add something or add a reliable source cannot be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits like what it said there. Doing it manually may take a while or may not know who made it to the first cut. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- You are incorrect. Any editor may remove unsourced claims right away, this is exactly what WP:BURDEN says.
Do not ever insert old-colored maps, even if there is no new-colored map yet, per WP:ACCESSIBILITY, as you did here. Doing so discourages the making of a new-colored map as well. Jasper Deng (talk) 10:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mister International 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leya.
(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Supranational 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maitland.
(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mister Supranational 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazonas.
(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Can you please read over what you write? This is technically incorrect and redundant. Don’t make others have to clean up after you. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Your edit to Draft:Tropical Storm Fengshen (2025) has been undone. Please stop breaking up refs across several paragraphs. 203.145.95.34 (talk) 20:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
