User talk:Timtrent: Difference between revisions

Timtrent is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is the home account for Fiddle Faddle, which is both my nickname and my alternate account. When you begin a new message section here, I will respond to it here. When I leave message on your Talk page, I will watch your page for your response. This maintains discussion threads and continuity. See Help:Talk page#How to keep a two-way conversation readable. If you want to use {{Talkback}} or {{ping}} to alert me about messages elsewhere, please feel free to do so. Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify them!

SCAM WARNING If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Please report it to paid-en-wpwikipedia.org. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

In the event that what you seek is not here then it is archived (0.9 probability). While you are welcome to potter through the archives the meaning of life is not there.

A goat is a papyrovore that eats articles that have been moved into article space without evidence of notability.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon Chomp chomp. Also the

Greatest

Of

All

Time!

I like goats 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:43, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No references = No article. Right to the point. You were reviewing the sandbox while I was renaming the sandbox, so we did not edit-conflict because we were on different sections of the race. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon It saves faffing about! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:21, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Timtrent. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Octagram Tech, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: draftified in lieu of deletion. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 09:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Not an unreasonablenapproach. It is, however, an apparent one man band with the creating editor as that musician. I have doubts that it will ever be fit for mainspace, but they may give it their best shot. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 09:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I don’t think it’s going anywhere either. But I prefer this approach as less bitey, and also because then if they go to the AFC help desk, non-admins can actually answer questions about why it wasn’t accepted. — asilvering (talk) 10:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources&diff=384989585&oldid=398489876&variant=en ~2025-32502-84 (talk) 09:12, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]