User talk:ToBeFree: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 38: Line 38:

:{{green checkmark}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree#top|talk]]) 00:53, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

:{{green checkmark}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree#top|talk]]) 00:53, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

:Mh. Hi {{u|asilvering}}, I was in a hurry yesterday. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Noritandas&oldid=1311019959#UTRS_appeal_#106241 current state] of {{u|Noritandas}}’s talk page doesn’t give me much hope and I have no idea why someone would so insistently want to regain access to enwiki if editing a Wikipedia in their native language is completely not an option and the language barrier is so visibly high. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree#top|talk]]) 22:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 22:38, 12 September 2025

To add this button to your own talk page, you can use {{User new message large}}. It can easily be modified: Colorful examples are provided on the “Template:User new message large” page.

Please note that you are currently not logged in.

This is not a general problem – you can leave a message anyway, but your IP address might change during the discussion, and I might end up talking to a wall. Creating an account does not require an e-mail address; all you need is a password and a name. You are not required to do this, but please consider creating an account before starting long-term interactions with other users. Thank you very much in advance.

Just a heads-up that the article is being edited by an IP apparently claiming to be the subject.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:29, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skywatcher68, thank you very much for the notification! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. ToBeFree. Nice to meet you. I am a new editor. And I have something. I really think the page was too negative on Robert M. LaFollette that was undid. I believed the editor to make it more positive because many people around him really support him. People kept blocking him, but he just did not know how to answer or justify the change properly. Can you please help me, so we can solve the problem together? Please be nice to me and please don’t block me. All I want is understand both sides. Thank you so much. I would love to talk to you more. TheHistorianEditor (talk) 03:09, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheHistorianEditor, I think you might be looking for the article’s talk page, where you could create a new section to discuss the issue. Feel free to invite those who have reverted to the discussion, for example using {{Please see}} on their user talk pages. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems we have a new editor from an IP who doesn’t know how to properly format references. As far as I can tell, except for the questionable reliability of Texas Scorecard, the content and references are valid but I won’t have time to correct the formatting until I’m off work.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skywatcher68, I’ve had a look at the article’s history for a while now but would currently not protect the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

is one of yours, if you’re available to comment. Thanks. — asilvering (talk) 00:08, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Y ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:53, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mh. Hi asilvering, I was in a hurry yesterday. The current state of Noritandas‘s talk page doesn’t give me much hope and I have no idea why someone would so insistently want to regain access to enwiki if editing a Wikipedia in their native language is completely not an option and the language barrier is so visibly high. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version