User talk:Torgaar: Difference between revisions

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GGOTCC was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Elementary schools are not considered inherently notable (WP:NSCHOOL) and this article does not help by only citing a directory and the school’s website. Is there anything notable (ie. historic events, the architecture) beyond the school existing?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

GGOTCC 18:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Torgaar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GGOTCC 18:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Cabrils (talk) 23:08, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is this not important? And where in Wikipedia would this go if it shouldn’t have its own article? Torgaar (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Torgaar We do not care about importance as that is objective, but instead focus on the notability. Notability of a topic is determined by the sources, as explained above. The only sources independent of the school is the article from The Bee and DNCR webpage. However, neither of these pieces focus on the school and only mention it while covering other topics. Not every school needs an article, and it is already mentioned on Portland Public Schools (Oregon). GGOTCC 02:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians who kind of know how to use Power BI indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who have no idea how to use Power BI has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category’s entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun…} 18:07, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]