From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
|
|||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|
<!– Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 –> |
<!– Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 –> |
||
|
|
, you’re a pedo-satanist. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-21282-8|~2026-21282-8]] ([[User talk:~2026-21282-8|talk]]) 00:11, 11 January 2026 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:18, 11 January 2026
Hi ToxinDemon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! AryKun (talk) 10:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberto Vannacci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
ToxicDemon, you’re a pedo-satanist. ~2026-21282-8 (talk) 00:11, 11 January 2026 (UTC)



