User talk:Valorrr: Difference between revisions

Things I can do to help WikiProject U.S. Congressedit list Ongoing: Upload [please add links to the senate rules for each of these committees.] Ongoing: Upload new district maps and incorporate them into articles (November 19, 2013) Ongoing: Apply {{US Congress party summary}} on all Congresses (February 20, 2018) Ongoing: Create edit notices for all articles. (February 15, 2010) Ongoing: Rate all articles that haven’t been rated yet. (April 28, 2025)

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

It is 4:37 PM where this user lives.

The citation was WP:IMPROPERLYSOURCED. Read the citation for yourself before quick to assuming all ip editors are bad. 67.218.106.106 (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was an act of good faith. I’m sorry… Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 18:45, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@67.218.106.106; Just a little tip; According to Wikipedia:SALON.COM,
There is no consensus on the reliability of Salon. Editors consider Salon biased or opinionated, and its statements should be attributed.
Therefore; it is not “Improperly Sourced”; you can add the tag ^{[better source needed]} instead of removing the improperly source material; It is still proper. Next time don’t blank it! (Also WP:IMPROPERLYSOURCED, does not exist.) Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 20:12, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you don’t know phonetics, the reason “Nasal velar approximant” is related to “Voiced velar approximant” is because it is the nasalized equivalent. And no, it is mentioned. See the “Occurrence” section, specifically the Japanese entry, which has the phonetic symbol “ɰ̃”. Even if the entry says it is “broadly described as dorso-velar,” but “exact placement of articulation varies” and also says it is a “Syllable-final moraic nasal realization” and at least for this example it has the diacritic ː, it might occur in other languages too, and we might be able to merge from the draft and maybe even make a dedicated section at the target. For the draft, unless it becomes notable, we should have a redirect. Maybe perhaps we should not submit this redirect for now. BodhiHarp 21:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’d recommend keeping up on the draft; I didn’t want to submit another CSD due to a draft. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 21:37, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]