User talk:Victor Ningthemcha: Difference between revisions

Line 227: Line 227:

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks again, and happy editing!

[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 14:32, 25 June 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 14:32, 25 June 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

== [[Draft:Heingang|Heingang]] moved to draftspace ==

Thanks for your contributions to [[Draft:Heingang|Heingang]]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because ”’it consists of machine-generated text”’.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at [[Help:Unreviewed new page]].

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 12:47, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Keishampat|Keishampat]] (July 4) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by UtherSRG was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:<br />

* [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]] and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]]

* [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects

* [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]]

* [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]]

* [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br />

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]].|}}<!–

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Keishampat]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Keishampat ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UtherSRG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keishampat ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 12:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

:I don’t know how you think that was AI generated. The article is very short and is to be extended later when it’s reviewed. If you look at history section, it took me times to write it. Please check again kindly. Thank you [[User:Victor Ningthemcha|<span style=”color:#1a0dab;”>Victor</span> <span style=”color:#d32f2f;”><b>Ningthemcha</b></span>]] ([[User talk:Victor Ningthemcha|talk]]) 12:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Sagolband|Sagolband]] (July 4) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by UtherSRG was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:<br />

* [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]] and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]]

* [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects

* [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]]

* [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]]

* [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br />

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]].|}}<!–

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Sagolband]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Sagolband ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UtherSRG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sagolband ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 12:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

:I still don’t understand why reviewers from now are rejecting my draft articles because you suspect that it was AI-generated because it’s long. I am not accusing this but, reviewers don’t remove my short articles, but move my articles, some of which are reviewed to draft space. [[User:Victor Ningthemcha|<span style=”color:#1a0dab;”>Victor</span> <span style=”color:#d32f2f;”><b>Ningthemcha</b></span>]] ([[User talk:Victor Ningthemcha|talk]]) 13:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

== [[WP:AfC|AfC]] notification: [[Draft:Keishampat]] has a new comment ==

<div style=”border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]]

I’ve left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Keishampat]]. Thanks! [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 14:29, 4 July 2025 (UTC) </div>

:I will try to improve my writings without checking for corrections on AIs. I sincerely appreciate your patience and feeling not angered. But, could you sometimes help me on getting tips for writing improvement? Thanks! [[User:Victor Ningthemcha|<span style=”color:#1a0dab;”>Victor</span> <span style=”color:#d32f2f;”><b>Ningthemcha</b></span>]] ([[User talk:Victor Ningthemcha|talk]]) 14:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

== [[Large language model|LLM]]s and grammar ==

Concerning [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)&diff=prev&oldid=1298754299]: [[Large language models]] ”are not” [[grammar checkers]], models have no concept of grammar, they are pattern matching devices. If you prompt a model to check grammar it will attempt to complete the pattern that your prompt has started, this can include grammar corrections, it can also include the introduction of [[Hallucination (AI)|hallucinations]] or other errors (such as the malformatted {{tq|*Khuman Ningthourol*}} in your most recently created article, [[Special:PermanentLink/1298713830|Pamingnaba]]). You should never copy and paste output directly from a model into Wikipedia without ”thoroughly” reviewing it for introduced errors or hallucinations, regardless of what the model was prompted to do. [[Special:Contributions/fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four]]&nbsp;([[User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|talk]]) 14:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for your clarifications and your feeling of non-anger! It was my mistake for using such language models to check grammars. I will confirm for future safety: I did not read any AI-related rules of Wikipedia sadly, even though I read the other ones. I can also confirm that I lack reading rules of Wikipedia and constantly neglect the rules for using AI, which I thought was minor. I am sorry for this and I hope to see your positive feedback again. Thanks for your time and understanding. [[User:Victor Ningthemcha|<span style=”color:#1a0dab;”>Victor</span> <span style=”color:#d32f2f;”><b>Ningthemcha</b></span>]] ([[User talk:Victor Ningthemcha|talk]]) 14:51, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Keishampat|Keishampat]] (July 4) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Itzcuauhtli11 was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />

* ”[[WP:Notability#General notability guideline|in-depth]]” (not just passing mentions about the subject)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|”independent”]] of the subject <br />

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Article doesn’t show why subject is notable. It doesn’t even says it’s a neighborhood. Too much emphasis in it’s etymology.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Keishampat]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Keishampat ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Itzcuauhtli11&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keishampat ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Itzcuauhtli11|<span style=”color:orange;”>”’— ”'</span><span style=”color:purple;”>”’Itzcuauhtli11”'</span>]] ([[User talk:Itzcuauhtli11|talk]]) 15:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

== [[WP:AfC|AfC]] notification: [[Draft:Heingang]] has a new comment ==

<div style=”border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]]

I’ve left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Heingang]]. Thanks! [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 19:50, 4 July 2025 (UTC) </div>

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

Line 511: Line 423:

If you have ”feedback” on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot’s talk page]]. Thanks from {{User0|Nettrom}}, SuggestBot’s caretaker. — [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 10:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

If you have ”feedback” on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot’s talk page]]. Thanks from {{User0|Nettrom}}, SuggestBot’s caretaker. — [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 10:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Keishampat|Keishampat]] (July 6) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Qcne was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />

* ”[[WP:Notability#General notability guideline|in-depth]]” (not just passing mentions about the subject)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|”independent”]] of the subject <br />

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Does not seem to meet [[WP:NGEO]].}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Keishampat]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Keishampat ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keishampat ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

<span style=”background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;”>”'[[User:Qcne|<span style=”color: GhostWhite”>qcne</span>]]”’ <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style=”color: GhostWhite”>(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 21:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

== July 2025 ==

== July 2025 ==

Line 554: Line 446:

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ”procedures”, you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks’ noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!– Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first –> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 10:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ”procedures”, you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks’ noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!– Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first –> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 10:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

== Improvements to the draft ==

Hi, I’ve made substantial improvements to this draft of ”'[[Draft:Sagolband|Sagolband]]”’. The article now includes expanded and properly sourced sections on geography, civic administration, cultural festivals (including [[Heikru Hidongba]]), transportation, landmarks, and notable people. All previously cited references have been preserved and fully utilized, and the infobox has been cleaned up and updated.

If you’re the original contributor, feel free to review the changes. If you’re satisfied with the improvements, you may consider submitting the draft for review again. If you find the updates helpful, you’re also welcome to leave a thank you. 😊

Best regards,

[[User:Imperial khasah|Imperial khasah]] ([[User talk:Imperial khasah|talk]]) 11:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks! I will take a look! 🙂 [[User:Victor Ningthemcha|<span style=”color:#1a0dab;”>Victor</span> <span style=”color:#d32f2f;”><b>Ningthemcha</b></span>]] ([[User talk:Victor Ningthemcha|talk]]) 12:24, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Heingang]] has been accepted ==

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Heingang]] has been accepted ==

Line 584: Line 465:

:Thank you so much! 🙂 [[User:Victor Ningthemcha|<span style=”color:#1a0dab;”>Victor</span> <span style=”color:#d32f2f;”><b>Ningthemcha</b></span>]] ([[User talk:Victor Ningthemcha|talk]]) 13:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you so much! 🙂 [[User:Victor Ningthemcha|<span style=”color:#1a0dab;”>Victor</span> <span style=”color:#d32f2f;”><b>Ningthemcha</b></span>]] ([[User talk:Victor Ningthemcha|talk]]) 13:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

::You’re welcome! I think it got stuck in drafts because assessing for LLMs is quite tricky but it appears a significant amount of rewording has taken place. Good work on the article! [[:user:sksatsuma|<span class=”tmpl-colored-link mw-no-invert” style=”color: teal; text-decoration: inherit;”>sk</span>]][[:User talk:Sksatsuma|<span class=”tmpl-colored-link mw-no-invert” style=”color: orange; text-decoration: inherit;”>satsuma</span>]] 13:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

::You’re welcome! I think it got stuck in drafts because assessing for LLMs is quite tricky but it appears a significant amount of rewording has taken place. Good work on the article! [[:user:sksatsuma|<span class=”tmpl-colored-link mw-no-invert” style=”color: teal; text-decoration: inherit;”>sk</span>]][[:User talk:Sksatsuma|<span class=”tmpl-colored-link mw-no-invert” style=”color: orange; text-decoration: inherit;”>satsuma</span>]] 13:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Sagolband|Sagolband]] (July 24) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:Dialog-STOP.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Sagolband ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help]].<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason<!– pluralize “reason” –><!–empty–> left by CNMall41 was: This submission is [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia]].<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was: Concerns about LLM have not been addressed. Until they are, this should not be resubmitted.

{{clear}}

[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 17:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC reject–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Rajkumar Madhubir]] has been accepted ==

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Rajkumar Madhubir]] has been accepted ==

Line 607: Line 481:

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks again, and happy editing!

[[User:MCE89|MCE89]] ([[User talk:MCE89|talk]]) 04:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

[[User:MCE89|MCE89]] ([[User talk:MCE89|talk]]) 04:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Keishampat|Keishampat]] (September 11) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />

* ”[[WP:Notability#General notability guideline|in-depth]]” (not just passing mentions about the subject)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|”independent”]] of the subject <br />

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=So, your sources refer to sub areas of Keishampat, such as Keishampat Leimajam Leikai, and larger regions it belongs to, Imphal, but don’t actually mention Keishampat itself as a seperate entity… until we have more citations specifically about Keishampat, I’m afraid I won’t be able to accept the article as written.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Keishampat]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Keishampat ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Absurdum4242&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keishampat ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Absurdum4242|Absurdum4242]] ([[User talk:Absurdum4242|talk]]) 19:31, 11 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:House of Karta|House of Karta]] (September 15) ==

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:House of Karta|House of Karta]] (September 15) ==

Hello everyone! Welcome to my Talk page!

Hello, Victor Ningthemcha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don’t hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:12, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ajit Sai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I understand. I got some sources right now but, is it too late to add them? Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 14:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Draft:Ajit Sai. However, one of Wikipedia’s core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors’ help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At the same draft article, you added “Review of A History of Assam”. I’m not seeing that claim supported in the 1927 work – can you please supply a page number and a brief quote of the material you feel is supporting this? Sam Kuru (talk) 17:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sam Kuru,
Thank you for your feedback regarding the citations in the Draft:Ajit Sai article. I apologize for inadvertently using mirrored sources that led to circular references. I understand the importance of verifiability and the need to attribute information to reliable, independent sources.
I have reviewed and corrected the citations in the article, ensuring they now reference appropriate and verifiable sources. I appreciate your guidance and will be more diligent in adhering to Wikipedia’s sourcing policies in future contributions.
Best regards,
Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 03:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You did not. You simply restored the mirror, removed the request for page numbers and quotes from your sources, and introduced a garbage tripod page. Again, please supply the page numbers and quotes from the materials you added. If you’re just adding random sources, please just say that and remove the material. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I corrected the sources. And it is not that I was just adding random sources. I added multiple same sources instead of re-using them on my page but now, I changed that and added the correct ones. Please give me your feedbacks.
Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, here you’ve added another obvious mirror. You even labeled it as such. Please consider this a final warning, we cannot use copies of our own material as sources. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warning. I understand now that mirror sites aren’t acceptable sources, even if labeled. I believe I may have used one in an earlier edit as well, and I apologize for that. I’ll be more careful going forward and make sure to rely only on reliable, independent sources. I really appreciate your time and patience. 🙂 Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chitshai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because COI editors really shoudl await a review and not move to mainspace unitaterally.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have assumed a simple WP:COI and flagged this correctly on the Draft and its Talk Page, though please read, understand, and act on WP:PAID if necessary. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sorry it was my mistake. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 09:04, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loiyumba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ancient Manipur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ningthemcha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and multiple of these sources are unavailable/do not support the text. Was AI used to generate any part of this text?.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sarsenethe/they•(talk) 03:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I will try. I was just making sure if the articles published like that will be good for wikipedia but, turns out it was not, thanks for letting me know 🙂 Also, I did not use AI, I don’t even know how AI will know any of that. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 04:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Iwanthaba did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the Talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Legend of 14 (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I’ll make sure to do it next time. Thanks for the reminder Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luwangsangbam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for moving the draft to mainspace! I really appreciate your time and support. I’ll continue improving the article and contributing to Wikipedia to help share more knowledge with the world. Thanks again! 😊 Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 12:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Astra Travasso was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fix citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Astra Travasso (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I fixed the articles and added more reliable sources. Could you please take a look to it? Thanks! Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 03:09, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Victor Ningthemcha!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Astra Travasso (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khaidem Leikai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Afstromen (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heingang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Astra Travasso (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kabui Khullen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 05:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saroj Nalini Arambam Parratt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yoimongba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:32, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot’s talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you’ve edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot’s talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot’s caretaker. — SuggestBot (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi Victor Ningthemcha! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Loiyumpa Silyel several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you’re aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Loiyumpa Silyel, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. We are talking about how to improve the article. Not a fight but an argument-discussion. 🙂 Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 10:33, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 10:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heingang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sksatsuma 13:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! 🙂 Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome! I think it got stuck in drafts because assessing for LLMs is quite tricky but it appears a significant amount of rewording has taken place. Good work on the article! sksatsuma 13:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rajkumar Madhubir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, I have no more hope to edit the article because of the vandalism going on the articles related to Manipur and its histories. I have stopped editing on English Wikipedia because of that. Informations about us are not much known and sources lack because no one wanted to create about it including the House of Karta. I myself belong to that royal house. The royal house still has many members descending from Bhagyachandra who himself is also known as Karta Maharaj. However, I have no choice but to stop editing in the article because the article itself was reviewed very well some times ago but someone moved it to the draft space and from that on, I have not been able to get the article reviewed and verified. Thank you for checking on the article, still. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 09:20, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Adon Nongba Khomba. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because please provide enough information in your footnotes so as to meet WP:VERIFY. To see what needs to be included in footnotes, please refer to WP:CITE..
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 15:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 Hi, I have completed it. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 Hi, could you help review my draft article Draft:House of Karta and tell me what needs to be changed if its not reliable? I will appreciate it kindly. 🙂 Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t tag it for unreliable sources. I reviewed the draft and moved it back into mainspace. Onel5969 TT me 00:14, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 03:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Victor Ningthemcha,

Thank you for creating Khomba Ningthouba.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

please provide enough information in your footnotes so as to meet WP:VERIFY. To see what needs to be included in footnotes, please refer to WP:CITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 10:30, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Victor Ningthemcha,

Thank you for creating Laiphangba.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

please provide enough information in your footnotes so as to meet WP:VERIFY. To see what needs to be included in footnotes, please refer to WP:CITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 10:35, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 Thanks, will do. Also, do you happen to be a draft reviewer? Because I need someone to review a draft article which is important for the Medieval history of Manipur. Please let me know, and thanks. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Punshi Yumoiba. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 13:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 Sorry, I forgot to change them. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. btw, I took a look at your draft. I would reach out to the editor who declined it, and work with them to show the line’s notability. Onel5969 TT me 13:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 Hi, I have completed the draft. Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:58, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Punshi Yumoiba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 14:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top