User talk:Yubudirsi: Difference between revisions

Hello, Yubudirsi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can’t find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Magherbin. I noticed that you made a comment that didn’t seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magherbin (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t remember posting anything uncivil towards you but if I did I apologise in advance. Yubudirsi (talk) 04:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Adal (15th century). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  // Timothy :: talk  00:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this topic is not covered by many historians, Richard Pankhurst clearly talks about the battle in his book that I cited on that page, I don’t seem to get the problem here ? Yubudirsi (talk) 05:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1st Bali expedition. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  // Timothy :: talk  00:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can I not use primary sources ? Yubudirsi (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently you have created multiple new articles which lack references clearly showing notability.

• Please add references showing notability to the article. Articles that fail to show notability may be deleted; adding references will improve the article and assist in preventing deletion. Once you have added references showing notability, please submit to Articles for Creation (see article for link).
• Before proceeding, please read the following guidelines Independent sources, reliable sources, Significant coverage, Cite your sources, primary sources and Notability.
• Please pay particular attention to the significant coverage guideline, to show notability sources need to have multiple sources which address the topic ‘directly and in detail.
• Articles which do not have sources showing notability may be deleted or merged/redirected to other articles.
• Sources connected to the subject (in anyway) cannot be used to show notability.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask them at the WP:TEAHOUSE,  // Timothy :: talk  00:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yubudirsi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I’ve started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Battle of Jazja, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jazja.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it’s not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TimothyBlue}}. And don’t forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 // Timothy :: talk  01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand, why should it be deleted ?? Yubudirsi (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TimothyBlue:

Why is it being deleted

Matan ibn Uthman (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 // Timothy :: talk  19:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Socialwave597 (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yubudirsi,

Thank you for creating First Battle of Yedaya.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This battle is just a passing mention in the sources with no indication of the notability we expect from a stand-alone article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don’t really understand what you mean, could you be more clear on the passing mention ? I don’t understand how that’s an issue really ? The primary source as well as the secondary source mention a battle taking place, they mention where its taking place as well and the belligerents, maybe there’s something I’m missing, also how much time do I have to add more sources ? Secondary sources covering the history of the Adal Sultanate are very rare, it’s really an under-researched subject. I just bought two more books which cover the topic, they’re set to arrive soon. Yubudirsi (talk) 17:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Sultanate of Ifat has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases which are not attributed to their source may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Amélie Chekroun, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A “bare URL and missing title” error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it Yubudirsi (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article’s talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Magherbin (talk) 14:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, No.

It was an extract of Amélie Chekroun’s book talking about how the Argobba claim to Ifat and Adal is baseless, I don’t know why you deleted it please be more precise. Yubudirsi (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The thesis introduces fringe theory thats not widely accepted as explained on the same text “This idea was first put forward by Volker Stitz in 1973, then was subsequently widely taken up in historiography”. “Cette idée a été pour la première fois avancée par Volker Stitz en 1973, puis a été par la suite largement reprise dans l’historiographie”. Fringe theories are not to be put in articles. Do you think that the edit didnt also include original research about “mixed Hararis”? where did Amelie even mention this? Do not include original research and fringe theories onto articles. Its the Somali connection to Adal and Ifat thats fringe here and Amelie Chekroun explains this in the same paper. She states that Harari connection to Harar has not been proven and is perplexing, this is because sources are limited in Harar due to it being closed off until the 19th century. If you would like we will include your fringe theory (better worded without original research) however the line where Amelie Chekroun states Somalis made less than a fraction of the Adal army, they appropriate Harari Adal history and how Hararis have more of a claim to it than Somalis should also be included, see p.17. What do you think? Magherbin (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Magherbin (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check topic above I left a message Yubudirsi (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yubudirsi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I’ve started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Amélie Chekroun, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amélie Chekroun.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it’s not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don’t forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yubudirsi. Thank you for your work on First Battle of Yedaya. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yubudirsi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1st Bali expedition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yubudirsi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Adal (15th century), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yubudirsi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Battle of Adal“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabean colonization of Africa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabean colonization of Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you’ve significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Mukhtar Robow has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for uploading files related to Somalia, these contributions are really valuable and help improve the coverage of Somali topics on Wikipedia.

I just wanted to let you know that some of your uploads are missing proper license tags or source information. This can lead to them being flagged or deleted, which would be a loss for the Somali project. If you’re not fully familiar with how licensing works, especially under Somalia’s copyright law, feel free to reach out. I’m familiar with this and can help make sure your uploads are safe.

If you ever need help choosing the correct license or figuring out how to write source details, I’d be happy to help or even fix it with you. Let’s work together to make sure your uploads stay up and meet Wikipedia’s standards. Majid8097 (talk) 07:45, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yubudirsi Majid8097 (talk) 07:45, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yubudirsi can you please help me with the article creation for Somali Air Defence Forces. The draft requires minimal effort and I have done most of the work. What I need you to help me with, is the citations and that it doesn’t get cancelled when submitting. Mahadsanid walaal! Majid8097 (talk) 06:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With the removal of the WP:COPYVIO homemade coat of arms, and the Globalsecurity.org reference which is listed at WP:RSP as WP:GLOBALSECURITY, I have mainspaced this. Thank you for creating this article!! Buckshot06 (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping clean it up and moving it to mainspace. Appreciate you taking the time to improving this! Majid8097 (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buckshot06 Thanks again for your help earlier. I also have a draft about the Gorgor Special Forces (or Commando, depending on what you’d call it). I’ve already done about 99% of the work and I was just wondering if you might be able to help with setting it up like you did with the Somali Air Defence Forces page. Majid8097 (talk) 19:52, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a link and I will see what I can do, over the next few days. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gorgor_Special_Forces. I believe it won’t require much input. Majid8097 (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]