User:Khesed/Retinopathy of prematurity/Bfjulia Peer Review: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


Latest revision as of 17:11, 14 November 2025

Whose work are you reviewing?

Khesed

Link to draft you’re reviewing
https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/Vanderbilt_University_School_of_Medicine/WikiMed_Fall_2025_(F)/students/articles/Khesed?showArticle=982088074
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Retinopathy of prematurity

Evaluate the drafted changes

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • The lead has been given additional information that clarifies medical concepts.
  • The introductory sentence is more concise with such additional information.
  • The lead has one citation but does not get too specific; is appropriate for laypeople.
  • The lead is concise.
  • I appreciate the internal links added in the lead

Guiding questions:

  • Content is relevant to topic; helps clarifies topic.
  • Content utilizes recent citations in 2020s
  • Content helps clarifies one of the guideline tables included

Guiding questions:

Sources and References

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Citations include primary and secondary literature.
  • Content is accurate to sources with citations.
  • Main sources (e.g., eyewiki) are thorough and secondary.
  • Sources are current.
  • No tertiary sources were used.
  • Links work.

Guiding questions:

  • Content is easy to understand without spelling or grammatical errors while being in appropriate sections of the wikipage.

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

  • Article includes additional screening guideline table with additional written context to help clarify

Overall impressions

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Content helps clarify existing wikipedia information and adds a helpful visual (e.g., screening guidelines) with context.
  • Would clarify the “clinical judgement factors”–not sure what tempo refers to; I’d also move this part to AFTER the guidelines, like a “this is what screening guidelines is, XYZ, but clinicans may also do more screenings based on ABC”
  • Would write out the abbreviation for PMA
  • If you want, you can talk about the history/impact of the screening guidelines–how many cases are detected before and after these guidelines were instituted, how many babies are getting treatment sooner

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version