=== Overall impressions ===
=== Overall impressions ===
Overall, all of the content added, especially the biographical and film style content, has significantly improved the quality of the article and the representation of the subject. Citations are thoroughly included in every sentence and contains many links to other Wikipedia page to help connect the content to the rest of Wikipedia. It conveys a tone and appearance that I would expect from a very high-quality article.
Overall, all of the content added, especially the biographical and film style content, has significantly improved the quality of the article and the representation of the subject. Citations are thoroughly included in every sentence and contains many links to other Wikipedia page to help connect the content to the rest of Wikipedia. It conveys a tone and appearance that I would expect from a very high-quality article.
”’Maki Salmon:”’ Well done thoughtfully engaging with the article, providing _ with a detailed peer review!
 |
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you’re reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Kimdealfan124
- Link to draft you’re reviewing
- User:Kimdealfan124/Ariane Louis-Seize
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Ariane Louis-Seize
Evaluate the drafted changes
[edit]
The lead has been significantly improved with additional relevant information, while still being an appropriate length. It serves as a good summary of the content added, by including examples of recognizable work and a short blurb relevant to the section describing film style.
The content is relevant and very up to date, including information of works from the past few years. No content stands out as being irrelevant. The article deals with Wikipedia’s gap in biographical pages for women, especially female filmmakers. It avoids common traps found in other pages for women, such as defining their notoriety through a spousal or familial relationship.
The page was written with a neutral tone, and all acclaims and reviews are sourced from outside sources. The section describing Louis-Seize’s influences and style are heavily cited and do not appear to be original writing. Certain sentences use language such as “…have been described by reviewers…” may be replaced with the reviewers name to remove ambiguity and better fit the tone of Wikipedia.
Sources and References
[edit]
All of the added content is thoroughly backed up with citations. All of the references are relevant and published within the last 10 years; the articles are both diverse in their language (French and English) and the apparent gender of the authorship. Most linked sources are news articles, a few of them from public broadcasters or from film-centered websites. All links appear to be functional.
Overall the organization is well done, with sections that reflect major points and mimic other Wikipedia articles. A small note, sections such as “Early life and Education” and “References” can be made into headings, to better organize and distinguish each section. There are no apparent grammar or spelling mistakes.
No media has been added. The page may benefit from a portrait of the filmmaker, but that may not be possible.
Overall impressions
[edit]
Overall, all of the content added, especially the biographical and film style content, has significantly improved the quality of the article and the representation of the subject. Citations are thoroughly included in every sentence and contains many links to other Wikipedia page to help connect the content to the rest of Wikipedia. It conveys a tone and appearance that I would expect from a very high-quality article.
Maki Salmon: Well done thoughtfully engaging with the article, providing _ with a detailed peer review!
